Quantcast

Bad 2.2.1 release

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
8 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|  
Report Content as Inappropriate

Bad 2.2.1 release

David Blevins
Looks like our 2.2.1 release does not contain the final OpenEJB 3.1.4 binaries and instead contains older binaries from a release vote that never passed.  

$ cd /tmp
$ wget -q http://www.apache.org/dist/geronimo/2.2.1/geronimo-tomcat6-javaee5-2.2.1-bin.tar.gz
$ tar xzf geronimo-tomcat6-javaee5-2.2.1-bin.tar.gz
$ jar tvf /tmp/geronimo-tomcat6-javaee5-2.2.1/repository/org/apache/openejb/openejb-core/3.1.4/openejb-core-3.1.4.jar | tail
   562 Sun Oct 31 21:28:14 PDT 2010 org/openejb/OpenEJB.class
  7379 Sun Oct 31 21:28:10 PDT 2010 schema/openejb-jar.xsd
  6545 Sun Oct 31 21:28:10 PDT 2010 schema/openejb.xsd
  2882 Sun Oct 31 21:28:10 PDT 2010 schema/service-jar.xsd
    32 Sun Oct 31 21:28:10 PDT 2010 users.properties
     0 Sun Oct 31 21:33:30 PDT 2010 META-INF/maven/
     0 Sun Oct 31 21:33:30 PDT 2010 META-INF/maven/org.apache.openejb/
     0 Sun Oct 31 21:33:30 PDT 2010 META-INF/maven/org.apache.openejb/openejb-core/
 14964 Sun Oct 31 20:57:22 PDT 2010 META-INF/maven/org.apache.openejb/openejb-core/pom.xml
   115 Sun Oct 31 21:33:30 PDT 2010 META-INF/maven/org.apache.openejb/openejb-core/pom.properties

$ wget -q -U Maven http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/apache/openejb/openejb-core/3.1.4/openejb-core-3.1.4.jar
$ jar tvf openejb-core-3.1.4.jar | tail
   562 Fri Nov 12 15:32:08 PST 2010 org/openejb/OpenEJB.class
  7379 Fri Nov 12 15:32:06 PST 2010 schema/openejb-jar.xsd
  6545 Fri Nov 12 15:32:06 PST 2010 schema/openejb.xsd
  2882 Fri Nov 12 15:32:06 PST 2010 schema/service-jar.xsd
    32 Fri Nov 12 15:32:06 PST 2010 users.properties
     0 Fri Nov 12 15:32:14 PST 2010 META-INF/maven/
     0 Fri Nov 12 15:32:14 PST 2010 META-INF/maven/org.apache.openejb/
     0 Fri Nov 12 15:32:14 PST 2010 META-INF/maven/org.apache.openejb/openejb-core/
 14964 Fri Nov 12 15:12:40 PST 2010 META-INF/maven/org.apache.openejb/openejb-core/pom.xml
   115 Fri Nov 12 15:32:12 PST 2010 META-INF/maven/org.apache.openejb/openejb-core/pom.properties


Unfortunately that old openejb-3.1.4 binary contains this bug:

  https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENEJB-1394

We'll definitely need another 2.2.x release of some kind.  Whether or not we want to include any other fixes is probably a good discussion to have.


-David

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|  
Report Content as Inappropriate

Re: Bad 2.2.1 release

kevan
Administrator

On Jan 4, 2011, at 4:44 PM, David Blevins wrote:

> Looks like our 2.2.1 release does not contain the final OpenEJB 3.1.4 binaries and instead contains older binaries from a release vote that never passed.  
>
> $ cd /tmp
> $ wget -q http://www.apache.org/dist/geronimo/2.2.1/geronimo-tomcat6-javaee5-2.2.1-bin.tar.gz
> $ tar xzf geronimo-tomcat6-javaee5-2.2.1-bin.tar.gz
> $ jar tvf /tmp/geronimo-tomcat6-javaee5-2.2.1/repository/org/apache/openejb/openejb-core/3.1.4/openejb-core-3.1.4.jar | tail
>   562 Sun Oct 31 21:28:14 PDT 2010 org/openejb/OpenEJB.class
>  7379 Sun Oct 31 21:28:10 PDT 2010 schema/openejb-jar.xsd
>  6545 Sun Oct 31 21:28:10 PDT 2010 schema/openejb.xsd
>  2882 Sun Oct 31 21:28:10 PDT 2010 schema/service-jar.xsd
>    32 Sun Oct 31 21:28:10 PDT 2010 users.properties
>     0 Sun Oct 31 21:33:30 PDT 2010 META-INF/maven/
>     0 Sun Oct 31 21:33:30 PDT 2010 META-INF/maven/org.apache.openejb/
>     0 Sun Oct 31 21:33:30 PDT 2010 META-INF/maven/org.apache.openejb/openejb-core/
> 14964 Sun Oct 31 20:57:22 PDT 2010 META-INF/maven/org.apache.openejb/openejb-core/pom.xml
>   115 Sun Oct 31 21:33:30 PDT 2010 META-INF/maven/org.apache.openejb/openejb-core/pom.properties
>
> $ wget -q -U Maven http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/apache/openejb/openejb-core/3.1.4/openejb-core-3.1.4.jar
> $ jar tvf openejb-core-3.1.4.jar | tail
>   562 Fri Nov 12 15:32:08 PST 2010 org/openejb/OpenEJB.class
>  7379 Fri Nov 12 15:32:06 PST 2010 schema/openejb-jar.xsd
>  6545 Fri Nov 12 15:32:06 PST 2010 schema/openejb.xsd
>  2882 Fri Nov 12 15:32:06 PST 2010 schema/service-jar.xsd
>    32 Fri Nov 12 15:32:06 PST 2010 users.properties
>     0 Fri Nov 12 15:32:14 PST 2010 META-INF/maven/
>     0 Fri Nov 12 15:32:14 PST 2010 META-INF/maven/org.apache.openejb/
>     0 Fri Nov 12 15:32:14 PST 2010 META-INF/maven/org.apache.openejb/openejb-core/
> 14964 Fri Nov 12 15:12:40 PST 2010 META-INF/maven/org.apache.openejb/openejb-core/pom.xml
>   115 Fri Nov 12 15:32:12 PST 2010 META-INF/maven/org.apache.openejb/openejb-core/pom.properties
>
>
> Unfortunately that old openejb-3.1.4 binary contains this bug:
>
>  https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENEJB-1394
>
> We'll definitely need another 2.2.x release of some kind.  Whether or not we want to include any other fixes is probably a good discussion to have.

Yep. Thanks for finding that... Seems like we need to update our release process to include a "delete your local maven repository" step... Or some other precaution to prevent this from happening.

--kevan
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|  
Report Content as Inappropriate

Re: Bad 2.2.1 release

Rex Wang-2
I remember I did clean the local repo before making 221 release artifacts.
I checked the openejb-core in my local repo and it is the one of 12 Nov,
so I think the http://www.apache.org/dist/geronimo/2.2.1/geronimo-tomcat6-javaee5-2.2.1-bin.tar.gz
might be different from the one in maven public repo which promoted from staging repo http://repo2.maven.org/maven2/org/apache/geronimo/assemblies/geronimo-tomcat6-javaee5/2.2.1/geronimo-tomcat6-javaee5-2.2.1-bin.tar.gz

I am downloading it to verify...

-Rex

2011/1/5 Kevan Miller <[hidden email]>

On Jan 4, 2011, at 4:44 PM, David Blevins wrote:

> Looks like our 2.2.1 release does not contain the final OpenEJB 3.1.4 binaries and instead contains older binaries from a release vote that never passed.
>
> $ cd /tmp
> $ wget -q http://www.apache.org/dist/geronimo/2.2.1/geronimo-tomcat6-javaee5-2.2.1-bin.tar.gz
> $ tar xzf geronimo-tomcat6-javaee5-2.2.1-bin.tar.gz
> $ jar tvf /tmp/geronimo-tomcat6-javaee5-2.2.1/repository/org/apache/openejb/openejb-core/3.1.4/openejb-core-3.1.4.jar | tail
>   562 Sun Oct 31 21:28:14 PDT 2010 org/openejb/OpenEJB.class
>  7379 Sun Oct 31 21:28:10 PDT 2010 schema/openejb-jar.xsd
>  6545 Sun Oct 31 21:28:10 PDT 2010 schema/openejb.xsd
>  2882 Sun Oct 31 21:28:10 PDT 2010 schema/service-jar.xsd
>    32 Sun Oct 31 21:28:10 PDT 2010 users.properties
>     0 Sun Oct 31 21:33:30 PDT 2010 META-INF/maven/
>     0 Sun Oct 31 21:33:30 PDT 2010 META-INF/maven/org.apache.openejb/
>     0 Sun Oct 31 21:33:30 PDT 2010 META-INF/maven/org.apache.openejb/openejb-core/
> 14964 Sun Oct 31 20:57:22 PDT 2010 META-INF/maven/org.apache.openejb/openejb-core/pom.xml
>   115 Sun Oct 31 21:33:30 PDT 2010 META-INF/maven/org.apache.openejb/openejb-core/pom.properties
>
> $ wget -q -U Maven http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/apache/openejb/openejb-core/3.1.4/openejb-core-3.1.4.jar
> $ jar tvf openejb-core-3.1.4.jar | tail
>   562 Fri Nov 12 15:32:08 PST 2010 org/openejb/OpenEJB.class
>  7379 Fri Nov 12 15:32:06 PST 2010 schema/openejb-jar.xsd
>  6545 Fri Nov 12 15:32:06 PST 2010 schema/openejb.xsd
>  2882 Fri Nov 12 15:32:06 PST 2010 schema/service-jar.xsd
>    32 Fri Nov 12 15:32:06 PST 2010 users.properties
>     0 Fri Nov 12 15:32:14 PST 2010 META-INF/maven/
>     0 Fri Nov 12 15:32:14 PST 2010 META-INF/maven/org.apache.openejb/
>     0 Fri Nov 12 15:32:14 PST 2010 META-INF/maven/org.apache.openejb/openejb-core/
> 14964 Fri Nov 12 15:12:40 PST 2010 META-INF/maven/org.apache.openejb/openejb-core/pom.xml
>   115 Fri Nov 12 15:32:12 PST 2010 META-INF/maven/org.apache.openejb/openejb-core/pom.properties
>
>
> Unfortunately that old openejb-3.1.4 binary contains this bug:
>
>  https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENEJB-1394
>
> We'll definitely need another 2.2.x release of some kind.  Whether or not we want to include any other fixes is probably a good discussion to have.

Yep. Thanks for finding that... Seems like we need to update our release process to include a "delete your local maven repository" step... Or some other precaution to prevent this from happening.

--kevan



--
Lei Wang (Rex)
rwonly AT apache.org
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|  
Report Content as Inappropriate

Re: Bad 2.2.1 release

Rex Wang-2
Verified.

the one http://repo2.maven.org/maven2/org/apache/geronimo/assemblies/geronimo-tomcat6-javaee5/2.2.1/geronimo-tomcat6-javaee5-2.2.1-bin.tar.gz is correct.

So we need replace the wrong one in dist.

-Rex

2011/1/5 Rex Wang <[hidden email]>
I remember I did clean the local repo before making 221 release artifacts.
I checked the openejb-core in my local repo and it is the one of 12 Nov,
so I think the http://www.apache.org/dist/geronimo/2.2.1/geronimo-tomcat6-javaee5-2.2.1-bin.tar.gz
might be different from the one in maven public repo which promoted from staging repo http://repo2.maven.org/maven2/org/apache/geronimo/assemblies/geronimo-tomcat6-javaee5/2.2.1/geronimo-tomcat6-javaee5-2.2.1-bin.tar.gz

I am downloading it to verify...

-Rex

2011/1/5 Kevan Miller <[hidden email]>


On Jan 4, 2011, at 4:44 PM, David Blevins wrote:

> Looks like our 2.2.1 release does not contain the final OpenEJB 3.1.4 binaries and instead contains older binaries from a release vote that never passed.
>
> $ cd /tmp
> $ wget -q http://www.apache.org/dist/geronimo/2.2.1/geronimo-tomcat6-javaee5-2.2.1-bin.tar.gz
> $ tar xzf geronimo-tomcat6-javaee5-2.2.1-bin.tar.gz
> $ jar tvf /tmp/geronimo-tomcat6-javaee5-2.2.1/repository/org/apache/openejb/openejb-core/3.1.4/openejb-core-3.1.4.jar | tail
>   562 Sun Oct 31 21:28:14 PDT 2010 org/openejb/OpenEJB.class
>  7379 Sun Oct 31 21:28:10 PDT 2010 schema/openejb-jar.xsd
>  6545 Sun Oct 31 21:28:10 PDT 2010 schema/openejb.xsd
>  2882 Sun Oct 31 21:28:10 PDT 2010 schema/service-jar.xsd
>    32 Sun Oct 31 21:28:10 PDT 2010 users.properties
>     0 Sun Oct 31 21:33:30 PDT 2010 META-INF/maven/
>     0 Sun Oct 31 21:33:30 PDT 2010 META-INF/maven/org.apache.openejb/
>     0 Sun Oct 31 21:33:30 PDT 2010 META-INF/maven/org.apache.openejb/openejb-core/
> 14964 Sun Oct 31 20:57:22 PDT 2010 META-INF/maven/org.apache.openejb/openejb-core/pom.xml
>   115 Sun Oct 31 21:33:30 PDT 2010 META-INF/maven/org.apache.openejb/openejb-core/pom.properties
>
> $ wget -q -U Maven http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/apache/openejb/openejb-core/3.1.4/openejb-core-3.1.4.jar
> $ jar tvf openejb-core-3.1.4.jar | tail
>   562 Fri Nov 12 15:32:08 PST 2010 org/openejb/OpenEJB.class
>  7379 Fri Nov 12 15:32:06 PST 2010 schema/openejb-jar.xsd
>  6545 Fri Nov 12 15:32:06 PST 2010 schema/openejb.xsd
>  2882 Fri Nov 12 15:32:06 PST 2010 schema/service-jar.xsd
>    32 Fri Nov 12 15:32:06 PST 2010 users.properties
>     0 Fri Nov 12 15:32:14 PST 2010 META-INF/maven/
>     0 Fri Nov 12 15:32:14 PST 2010 META-INF/maven/org.apache.openejb/
>     0 Fri Nov 12 15:32:14 PST 2010 META-INF/maven/org.apache.openejb/openejb-core/
> 14964 Fri Nov 12 15:12:40 PST 2010 META-INF/maven/org.apache.openejb/openejb-core/pom.xml
>   115 Fri Nov 12 15:32:12 PST 2010 META-INF/maven/org.apache.openejb/openejb-core/pom.properties
>
>
> Unfortunately that old openejb-3.1.4 binary contains this bug:
>
>  https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENEJB-1394
>
> We'll definitely need another 2.2.x release of some kind.  Whether or not we want to include any other fixes is probably a good discussion to have.

Yep. Thanks for finding that... Seems like we need to update our release process to include a "delete your local maven repository" step... Or some other precaution to prevent this from happening.

--kevan



--
Lei Wang (Rex)
rwonly AT apache.org



--
Lei Wang (Rex)
rwonly AT apache.org
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|  
Report Content as Inappropriate

Re: Bad 2.2.1 release

Shawn J
Sorry,  I uploaded the versions to dist in my machine.  It contains
the  bad openejb 3.1.4 release which was downloaded when I used the
staging one to run tck.

Because Maven won't download the release artifacts again if there's
local one.   To avoid this kind of problems in the future,  we should
add a step in the release process to delete local repo before starting
the release.

This time, Luckily,  Rex could help upload the right geronimo
artifacts in his local machine to dist again to fix this.

On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 12:47 PM, Rex Wang <[hidden email]> wrote:

> Verified.
>
> the one
> http://repo2.maven.org/maven2/org/apache/geronimo/assemblies/geronimo-tomcat6-javaee5/2.2.1/geronimo-tomcat6-javaee5-2.2.1-bin.tar.gz
> is correct.
>
> So we need replace the wrong one in dist.
>
> -Rex
>
> 2011/1/5 Rex Wang <[hidden email]>
>>
>> I remember I did clean the local repo before making 221 release artifacts.
>> I checked the openejb-core in my local repo and it is the one of 12 Nov,
>> so I think the
>> http://www.apache.org/dist/geronimo/2.2.1/geronimo-tomcat6-javaee5-2.2.1-bin.tar.gz
>> might be different from the one in maven public repo which promoted from
>> staging repo
>> http://repo2.maven.org/maven2/org/apache/geronimo/assemblies/geronimo-tomcat6-javaee5/2.2.1/geronimo-tomcat6-javaee5-2.2.1-bin.tar.gz
>>
>> I am downloading it to verify...
>>
>> -Rex
>>
>> 2011/1/5 Kevan Miller <[hidden email]>
>>>
>>> On Jan 4, 2011, at 4:44 PM, David Blevins wrote:
>>>
>>> > Looks like our 2.2.1 release does not contain the final OpenEJB 3.1.4
>>> > binaries and instead contains older binaries from a release vote that never
>>> > passed.
>>> >
>>> > $ cd /tmp
>>> > $ wget -q
>>> > http://www.apache.org/dist/geronimo/2.2.1/geronimo-tomcat6-javaee5-2.2.1-bin.tar.gz
>>> > $ tar xzf geronimo-tomcat6-javaee5-2.2.1-bin.tar.gz
>>> > $ jar tvf
>>> > /tmp/geronimo-tomcat6-javaee5-2.2.1/repository/org/apache/openejb/openejb-core/3.1.4/openejb-core-3.1.4.jar
>>> > | tail
>>> >   562 Sun Oct 31 21:28:14 PDT 2010 org/openejb/OpenEJB.class
>>> >  7379 Sun Oct 31 21:28:10 PDT 2010 schema/openejb-jar.xsd
>>> >  6545 Sun Oct 31 21:28:10 PDT 2010 schema/openejb.xsd
>>> >  2882 Sun Oct 31 21:28:10 PDT 2010 schema/service-jar.xsd
>>> >    32 Sun Oct 31 21:28:10 PDT 2010 users.properties
>>> >     0 Sun Oct 31 21:33:30 PDT 2010 META-INF/maven/
>>> >     0 Sun Oct 31 21:33:30 PDT 2010 META-INF/maven/org.apache.openejb/
>>> >     0 Sun Oct 31 21:33:30 PDT 2010
>>> > META-INF/maven/org.apache.openejb/openejb-core/
>>> > 14964 Sun Oct 31 20:57:22 PDT 2010
>>> > META-INF/maven/org.apache.openejb/openejb-core/pom.xml
>>> >   115 Sun Oct 31 21:33:30 PDT 2010
>>> > META-INF/maven/org.apache.openejb/openejb-core/pom.properties
>>> >
>>> > $ wget -q -U Maven
>>> > http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/apache/openejb/openejb-core/3.1.4/openejb-core-3.1.4.jar
>>> > $ jar tvf openejb-core-3.1.4.jar | tail
>>> >   562 Fri Nov 12 15:32:08 PST 2010 org/openejb/OpenEJB.class
>>> >  7379 Fri Nov 12 15:32:06 PST 2010 schema/openejb-jar.xsd
>>> >  6545 Fri Nov 12 15:32:06 PST 2010 schema/openejb.xsd
>>> >  2882 Fri Nov 12 15:32:06 PST 2010 schema/service-jar.xsd
>>> >    32 Fri Nov 12 15:32:06 PST 2010 users.properties
>>> >     0 Fri Nov 12 15:32:14 PST 2010 META-INF/maven/
>>> >     0 Fri Nov 12 15:32:14 PST 2010 META-INF/maven/org.apache.openejb/
>>> >     0 Fri Nov 12 15:32:14 PST 2010
>>> > META-INF/maven/org.apache.openejb/openejb-core/
>>> > 14964 Fri Nov 12 15:12:40 PST 2010
>>> > META-INF/maven/org.apache.openejb/openejb-core/pom.xml
>>> >   115 Fri Nov 12 15:32:12 PST 2010
>>> > META-INF/maven/org.apache.openejb/openejb-core/pom.properties
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > Unfortunately that old openejb-3.1.4 binary contains this bug:
>>> >
>>> >  https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENEJB-1394
>>> >
>>> > We'll definitely need another 2.2.x release of some kind.  Whether or
>>> > not we want to include any other fixes is probably a good discussion to
>>> > have.
>>>
>>> Yep. Thanks for finding that... Seems like we need to update our release
>>> process to include a "delete your local maven repository" step... Or some
>>> other precaution to prevent this from happening.
>>>
>>> --kevan
>>
>>
>> --
>> Lei Wang (Rex)
>> rwonly AT apache.org
>
>
>
> --
> Lei Wang (Rex)
> rwonly AT apache.org
>



--
Shawn
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|  
Report Content as Inappropriate

Re: Bad 2.2.1 release

Rex Wang-2
I have re-uploaded all the correct 2.2.1 artifacts to dist.
Will they be automatically sync to all mirrors?

-Rex

2011/1/5 Shawn Jiang <[hidden email]>
Sorry,  I uploaded the versions to dist in my machine.  It contains
the  bad openejb 3.1.4 release which was downloaded when I used the
staging one to run tck.

Because Maven won't download the release artifacts again if there's
local one.   To avoid this kind of problems in the future,  we should
add a step in the release process to delete local repo before starting
the release.

This time, Luckily,  Rex could help upload the right geronimo
artifacts in his local machine to dist again to fix this.

On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 12:47 PM, Rex Wang <[hidden email]> wrote:
> Verified.
>
> the one
> http://repo2.maven.org/maven2/org/apache/geronimo/assemblies/geronimo-tomcat6-javaee5/2.2.1/geronimo-tomcat6-javaee5-2.2.1-bin.tar.gz
> is correct.
>
> So we need replace the wrong one in dist.
>
> -Rex
>
> 2011/1/5 Rex Wang <[hidden email]>
>>
>> I remember I did clean the local repo before making 221 release artifacts.
>> I checked the openejb-core in my local repo and it is the one of 12 Nov,
>> so I think the
>> http://www.apache.org/dist/geronimo/2.2.1/geronimo-tomcat6-javaee5-2.2.1-bin.tar.gz
>> might be different from the one in maven public repo which promoted from
>> staging repo
>> http://repo2.maven.org/maven2/org/apache/geronimo/assemblies/geronimo-tomcat6-javaee5/2.2.1/geronimo-tomcat6-javaee5-2.2.1-bin.tar.gz
>>
>> I am downloading it to verify...
>>
>> -Rex
>>
>> 2011/1/5 Kevan Miller <[hidden email]>
>>>
>>> On Jan 4, 2011, at 4:44 PM, David Blevins wrote:
>>>
>>> > Looks like our 2.2.1 release does not contain the final OpenEJB 3.1.4
>>> > binaries and instead contains older binaries from a release vote that never
>>> > passed.
>>> >
>>> > $ cd /tmp
>>> > $ wget -q
>>> > http://www.apache.org/dist/geronimo/2.2.1/geronimo-tomcat6-javaee5-2.2.1-bin.tar.gz
>>> > $ tar xzf geronimo-tomcat6-javaee5-2.2.1-bin.tar.gz
>>> > $ jar tvf
>>> > /tmp/geronimo-tomcat6-javaee5-2.2.1/repository/org/apache/openejb/openejb-core/3.1.4/openejb-core-3.1.4.jar
>>> > | tail
>>> >   562 Sun Oct 31 21:28:14 PDT 2010 org/openejb/OpenEJB.class
>>> >  7379 Sun Oct 31 21:28:10 PDT 2010 schema/openejb-jar.xsd
>>> >  6545 Sun Oct 31 21:28:10 PDT 2010 schema/openejb.xsd
>>> >  2882 Sun Oct 31 21:28:10 PDT 2010 schema/service-jar.xsd
>>> >    32 Sun Oct 31 21:28:10 PDT 2010 users.properties
>>> >     0 Sun Oct 31 21:33:30 PDT 2010 META-INF/maven/
>>> >     0 Sun Oct 31 21:33:30 PDT 2010 META-INF/maven/org.apache.openejb/
>>> >     0 Sun Oct 31 21:33:30 PDT 2010
>>> > META-INF/maven/org.apache.openejb/openejb-core/
>>> > 14964 Sun Oct 31 20:57:22 PDT 2010
>>> > META-INF/maven/org.apache.openejb/openejb-core/pom.xml
>>> >   115 Sun Oct 31 21:33:30 PDT 2010
>>> > META-INF/maven/org.apache.openejb/openejb-core/pom.properties
>>> >
>>> > $ wget -q -U Maven
>>> > http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/apache/openejb/openejb-core/3.1.4/openejb-core-3.1.4.jar
>>> > $ jar tvf openejb-core-3.1.4.jar | tail
>>> >   562 Fri Nov 12 15:32:08 PST 2010 org/openejb/OpenEJB.class
>>> >  7379 Fri Nov 12 15:32:06 PST 2010 schema/openejb-jar.xsd
>>> >  6545 Fri Nov 12 15:32:06 PST 2010 schema/openejb.xsd
>>> >  2882 Fri Nov 12 15:32:06 PST 2010 schema/service-jar.xsd
>>> >    32 Fri Nov 12 15:32:06 PST 2010 users.properties
>>> >     0 Fri Nov 12 15:32:14 PST 2010 META-INF/maven/
>>> >     0 Fri Nov 12 15:32:14 PST 2010 META-INF/maven/org.apache.openejb/
>>> >     0 Fri Nov 12 15:32:14 PST 2010
>>> > META-INF/maven/org.apache.openejb/openejb-core/
>>> > 14964 Fri Nov 12 15:12:40 PST 2010
>>> > META-INF/maven/org.apache.openejb/openejb-core/pom.xml
>>> >   115 Fri Nov 12 15:32:12 PST 2010
>>> > META-INF/maven/org.apache.openejb/openejb-core/pom.properties
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > Unfortunately that old openejb-3.1.4 binary contains this bug:
>>> >
>>> >  https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENEJB-1394
>>> >
>>> > We'll definitely need another 2.2.x release of some kind.  Whether or
>>> > not we want to include any other fixes is probably a good discussion to
>>> > have.
>>>
>>> Yep. Thanks for finding that... Seems like we need to update our release
>>> process to include a "delete your local maven repository" step... Or some
>>> other precaution to prevent this from happening.
>>>
>>> --kevan
>>
>>
>> --
>> Lei Wang (Rex)
>> rwonly AT apache.org
>
>
>
> --
> Lei Wang (Rex)
> rwonly AT apache.org
>



--
Shawn



--
Lei Wang (Rex)
rwonly AT apache.org
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|  
Report Content as Inappropriate

Re: Bad 2.2.1 release

Shawn J
Hi Henk,

We just updated the geronimo 2.2.1 artifacts in
/www/www.apache.org/dist/geronimo/.   Do you know if  they could be be
synchronized to other mirrors automatically ?

On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 2:40 PM, Rex Wang <[hidden email]> wrote:

> I have re-uploaded all the correct 2.2.1 artifacts to dist.
> Will they be automatically sync to all mirrors?
>
> -Rex
>
> 2011/1/5 Shawn Jiang <[hidden email]>
>>
>> Sorry,  I uploaded the versions to dist in my machine.  It contains
>> the  bad openejb 3.1.4 release which was downloaded when I used the
>> staging one to run tck.
>>
>> Because Maven won't download the release artifacts again if there's
>> local one.   To avoid this kind of problems in the future,  we should
>> add a step in the release process to delete local repo before starting
>> the release.
>>
>> This time, Luckily,  Rex could help upload the right geronimo
>> artifacts in his local machine to dist again to fix this.
>>
>> On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 12:47 PM, Rex Wang <[hidden email]> wrote:
>> > Verified.
>> >
>> > the one
>> >
>> > http://repo2.maven.org/maven2/org/apache/geronimo/assemblies/geronimo-tomcat6-javaee5/2.2.1/geronimo-tomcat6-javaee5-2.2.1-bin.tar.gz
>> > is correct.
>> >
>> > So we need replace the wrong one in dist.
>> >
>> > -Rex
>> >
>> > 2011/1/5 Rex Wang <[hidden email]>
>> >>
>> >> I remember I did clean the local repo before making 221 release
>> >> artifacts.
>> >> I checked the openejb-core in my local repo and it is the one of 12
>> >> Nov,
>> >> so I think the
>> >>
>> >> http://www.apache.org/dist/geronimo/2.2.1/geronimo-tomcat6-javaee5-2.2.1-bin.tar.gz
>> >> might be different from the one in maven public repo which promoted
>> >> from
>> >> staging repo
>> >>
>> >> http://repo2.maven.org/maven2/org/apache/geronimo/assemblies/geronimo-tomcat6-javaee5/2.2.1/geronimo-tomcat6-javaee5-2.2.1-bin.tar.gz
>> >>
>> >> I am downloading it to verify...
>> >>
>> >> -Rex
>> >>
>> >> 2011/1/5 Kevan Miller <[hidden email]>
>> >>>
>> >>> On Jan 4, 2011, at 4:44 PM, David Blevins wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>> > Looks like our 2.2.1 release does not contain the final OpenEJB
>> >>> > 3.1.4
>> >>> > binaries and instead contains older binaries from a release vote
>> >>> > that never
>> >>> > passed.
>> >>> >
>> >>> > $ cd /tmp
>> >>> > $ wget -q
>> >>> >
>> >>> > http://www.apache.org/dist/geronimo/2.2.1/geronimo-tomcat6-javaee5-2.2.1-bin.tar.gz
>> >>> > $ tar xzf geronimo-tomcat6-javaee5-2.2.1-bin.tar.gz
>> >>> > $ jar tvf
>> >>> >
>> >>> > /tmp/geronimo-tomcat6-javaee5-2.2.1/repository/org/apache/openejb/openejb-core/3.1.4/openejb-core-3.1.4.jar
>> >>> > | tail
>> >>> >   562 Sun Oct 31 21:28:14 PDT 2010 org/openejb/OpenEJB.class
>> >>> >  7379 Sun Oct 31 21:28:10 PDT 2010 schema/openejb-jar.xsd
>> >>> >  6545 Sun Oct 31 21:28:10 PDT 2010 schema/openejb.xsd
>> >>> >  2882 Sun Oct 31 21:28:10 PDT 2010 schema/service-jar.xsd
>> >>> >    32 Sun Oct 31 21:28:10 PDT 2010 users.properties
>> >>> >     0 Sun Oct 31 21:33:30 PDT 2010 META-INF/maven/
>> >>> >     0 Sun Oct 31 21:33:30 PDT 2010
>> >>> > META-INF/maven/org.apache.openejb/
>> >>> >     0 Sun Oct 31 21:33:30 PDT 2010
>> >>> > META-INF/maven/org.apache.openejb/openejb-core/
>> >>> > 14964 Sun Oct 31 20:57:22 PDT 2010
>> >>> > META-INF/maven/org.apache.openejb/openejb-core/pom.xml
>> >>> >   115 Sun Oct 31 21:33:30 PDT 2010
>> >>> > META-INF/maven/org.apache.openejb/openejb-core/pom.properties
>> >>> >
>> >>> > $ wget -q -U Maven
>> >>> >
>> >>> > http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/apache/openejb/openejb-core/3.1.4/openejb-core-3.1.4.jar
>> >>> > $ jar tvf openejb-core-3.1.4.jar | tail
>> >>> >   562 Fri Nov 12 15:32:08 PST 2010 org/openejb/OpenEJB.class
>> >>> >  7379 Fri Nov 12 15:32:06 PST 2010 schema/openejb-jar.xsd
>> >>> >  6545 Fri Nov 12 15:32:06 PST 2010 schema/openejb.xsd
>> >>> >  2882 Fri Nov 12 15:32:06 PST 2010 schema/service-jar.xsd
>> >>> >    32 Fri Nov 12 15:32:06 PST 2010 users.properties
>> >>> >     0 Fri Nov 12 15:32:14 PST 2010 META-INF/maven/
>> >>> >     0 Fri Nov 12 15:32:14 PST 2010
>> >>> > META-INF/maven/org.apache.openejb/
>> >>> >     0 Fri Nov 12 15:32:14 PST 2010
>> >>> > META-INF/maven/org.apache.openejb/openejb-core/
>> >>> > 14964 Fri Nov 12 15:12:40 PST 2010
>> >>> > META-INF/maven/org.apache.openejb/openejb-core/pom.xml
>> >>> >   115 Fri Nov 12 15:32:12 PST 2010
>> >>> > META-INF/maven/org.apache.openejb/openejb-core/pom.properties
>> >>> >
>> >>> >
>> >>> > Unfortunately that old openejb-3.1.4 binary contains this bug:
>> >>> >
>> >>> >  https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENEJB-1394
>> >>> >
>> >>> > We'll definitely need another 2.2.x release of some kind.  Whether
>> >>> > or
>> >>> > not we want to include any other fixes is probably a good discussion
>> >>> > to
>> >>> > have.
>> >>>
>> >>> Yep. Thanks for finding that... Seems like we need to update our
>> >>> release
>> >>> process to include a "delete your local maven repository" step... Or
>> >>> some
>> >>> other precaution to prevent this from happening.
>> >>>
>> >>> --kevan
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> Lei Wang (Rex)
>> >> rwonly AT apache.org
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > Lei Wang (Rex)
>> > rwonly AT apache.org
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Shawn
>
>
>
> --
> Lei Wang (Rex)
> rwonly AT apache.org
>



--
Shawn
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|  
Report Content as Inappropriate

Re: Bad 2.2.1 release

Henk P. Penning
On Wed, 5 Jan 2011, Shawn Jiang wrote:

> Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2011 15:25:35 +0800
> From: Shawn Jiang <[hidden email]>
> To: [hidden email], Henk Penning <[hidden email]>
> Subject: Re: Bad 2.2.1 release
>
> Hi Henk,
>
> We just updated the geronimo 2.2.1 artifacts in
> /www/www.apache.org/dist/geronimo/.   Do you know if  they could be be
> synchronized to other mirrors automatically ?
Hi Shawn Jiang,

   everything in 'people.apache.org:/www/www.apache.org/dist' is
   automatically synced to the apache rsync-servers every hour,
   where the mirrors will pick it up. So, yes, certainly.

   I noticed that the md5's of some geronimo artifacts have changed
   (since Sat Dec 11 15:17:22 2010) ; see

     http://people.apache.org/~henkp/checker/md5.html

   The sigs are good, but they are made with a key that is only
   self-signed, so it could be easily forged. Your release
   managers should have keys that are in the apache web-of-trust,
   that is, signed by at least a few other apache people.

   Groeten,

   HPP

> On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 2:40 PM, Rex Wang <[hidden email]> wrote:
>> I have re-uploaded all the correct 2.2.1 artifacts to dist.
>> Will they be automatically sync to all mirrors?
>>
>> -Rex
>>
>> 2011/1/5 Shawn Jiang <[hidden email]>
>>>
>>> Sorry,  I uploaded the versions to dist in my machine.  It contains
>>> the  bad openejb 3.1.4 release which was downloaded when I used the
>>> staging one to run tck.
>>>
>>> Because Maven won't download the release artifacts again if there's
>>> local one.   To avoid this kind of problems in the future,  we should
>>> add a step in the release process to delete local repo before starting
>>> the release.
>>>
>>> This time, Luckily,  Rex could help upload the right geronimo
>>> artifacts in his local machine to dist again to fix this.
>>>
>>> On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 12:47 PM, Rex Wang <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>>> Verified.
>>>>
>>>> the one
>>>>
>>>> http://repo2.maven.org/maven2/org/apache/geronimo/assemblies/geronimo-tomcat6-javaee5/2.2.1/geronimo-tomcat6-javaee5-2.2.1-bin.tar.gz
>>>> is correct.
>>>>
>>>> So we need replace the wrong one in dist.
>>>>
>>>> -Rex
>>>>
>>>> 2011/1/5 Rex Wang <[hidden email]>
>>>>>
>>>>> I remember I did clean the local repo before making 221 release
>>>>> artifacts.
>>>>> I checked the openejb-core in my local repo and it is the one of 12
>>>>> Nov,
>>>>> so I think the
>>>>>
>>>>> http://www.apache.org/dist/geronimo/2.2.1/geronimo-tomcat6-javaee5-2.2.1-bin.tar.gz
>>>>> might be different from the one in maven public repo which promoted
>>>>> from
>>>>> staging repo
>>>>>
>>>>> http://repo2.maven.org/maven2/org/apache/geronimo/assemblies/geronimo-tomcat6-javaee5/2.2.1/geronimo-tomcat6-javaee5-2.2.1-bin.tar.gz
>>>>>
>>>>> I am downloading it to verify...
>>>>>
>>>>> -Rex
>>>>>
>>>>> 2011/1/5 Kevan Miller <[hidden email]>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Jan 4, 2011, at 4:44 PM, David Blevins wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Looks like our 2.2.1 release does not contain the final OpenEJB
>>>>>>> 3.1.4
>>>>>>> binaries and instead contains older binaries from a release vote
>>>>>>> that never
>>>>>>> passed.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> $ cd /tmp
>>>>>>> $ wget -q
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> http://www.apache.org/dist/geronimo/2.2.1/geronimo-tomcat6-javaee5-2.2.1-bin.tar.gz
>>>>>>> $ tar xzf geronimo-tomcat6-javaee5-2.2.1-bin.tar.gz
>>>>>>> $ jar tvf
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> /tmp/geronimo-tomcat6-javaee5-2.2.1/repository/org/apache/openejb/openejb-core/3.1.4/openejb-core-3.1.4.jar
>>>>>>> | tail
>>>>>>>   562 Sun Oct 31 21:28:14 PDT 2010 org/openejb/OpenEJB.class
>>>>>>>  7379 Sun Oct 31 21:28:10 PDT 2010 schema/openejb-jar.xsd
>>>>>>>  6545 Sun Oct 31 21:28:10 PDT 2010 schema/openejb.xsd
>>>>>>>  2882 Sun Oct 31 21:28:10 PDT 2010 schema/service-jar.xsd
>>>>>>>    32 Sun Oct 31 21:28:10 PDT 2010 users.properties
>>>>>>>     0 Sun Oct 31 21:33:30 PDT 2010 META-INF/maven/
>>>>>>>     0 Sun Oct 31 21:33:30 PDT 2010
>>>>>>> META-INF/maven/org.apache.openejb/
>>>>>>>     0 Sun Oct 31 21:33:30 PDT 2010
>>>>>>> META-INF/maven/org.apache.openejb/openejb-core/
>>>>>>> 14964 Sun Oct 31 20:57:22 PDT 2010
>>>>>>> META-INF/maven/org.apache.openejb/openejb-core/pom.xml
>>>>>>>   115 Sun Oct 31 21:33:30 PDT 2010
>>>>>>> META-INF/maven/org.apache.openejb/openejb-core/pom.properties
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> $ wget -q -U Maven
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/apache/openejb/openejb-core/3.1.4/openejb-core-3.1.4.jar
>>>>>>> $ jar tvf openejb-core-3.1.4.jar | tail
>>>>>>>   562 Fri Nov 12 15:32:08 PST 2010 org/openejb/OpenEJB.class
>>>>>>>  7379 Fri Nov 12 15:32:06 PST 2010 schema/openejb-jar.xsd
>>>>>>>  6545 Fri Nov 12 15:32:06 PST 2010 schema/openejb.xsd
>>>>>>>  2882 Fri Nov 12 15:32:06 PST 2010 schema/service-jar.xsd
>>>>>>>    32 Fri Nov 12 15:32:06 PST 2010 users.properties
>>>>>>>     0 Fri Nov 12 15:32:14 PST 2010 META-INF/maven/
>>>>>>>     0 Fri Nov 12 15:32:14 PST 2010
>>>>>>> META-INF/maven/org.apache.openejb/
>>>>>>>     0 Fri Nov 12 15:32:14 PST 2010
>>>>>>> META-INF/maven/org.apache.openejb/openejb-core/
>>>>>>> 14964 Fri Nov 12 15:12:40 PST 2010
>>>>>>> META-INF/maven/org.apache.openejb/openejb-core/pom.xml
>>>>>>>   115 Fri Nov 12 15:32:12 PST 2010
>>>>>>> META-INF/maven/org.apache.openejb/openejb-core/pom.properties
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Unfortunately that old openejb-3.1.4 binary contains this bug:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>  https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENEJB-1394
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> We'll definitely need another 2.2.x release of some kind.  Whether
>>>>>>> or
>>>>>>> not we want to include any other fixes is probably a good discussion
>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>> have.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Yep. Thanks for finding that... Seems like we need to update our
>>>>>> release
>>>>>> process to include a "delete your local maven repository" step... Or
>>>>>> some
>>>>>> other precaution to prevent this from happening.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --kevan
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Lei Wang (Rex)
>>>>> rwonly AT apache.org
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Lei Wang (Rex)
>>>> rwonly AT apache.org
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Shawn
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Lei Wang (Rex)
>> rwonly AT apache.org
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Shawn
>
---------------------------------------------------------   _
Henk P. Penning, ICT-beta              R Uithof WISK-412  _/ \_
Faculty of Science, Utrecht University T +31 30 253 4106 / \_/ \
Budapestlaan 6, 3584CD Utrecht, NL     F +31 30 253 4553 \_/ \_/
http://people.cs.uu.nl/henkp/          M [hidden email]  \_/
Loading...