Nabble - Development

[jira] [Resolved] (GERONIMODEVTOOLS-810) Server status not updated as server hostname is changed in server configuration

2013-05-24T15:56:23Z

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMODEVTOOLS-810?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Forrest Xia resolved GERONIMODEVTOOLS-810.
------------------------------------------

Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 3.0.1

> Server status not updated as server hostname is changed in server configuration
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: GERONIMODEVTOOLS-810
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMODEVTOOLS-810
> Project: Geronimo-Devtools
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: eclipse-plugin
> Affects Versions: 3.0
> Reporter: Jarek Gawor
> Assignee: Jarek Gawor
> Fix For: 3.0.1
>
>
> Here's are the steps to demonstrate the issue:
> 1) Stat a local server - serer status should be [Started]
> 2) Edit server configuration and change hostname to specify a server on a remote host. The remote server should be stopped.
> The server status should eventually be updated to [Stopped] but it does not change.
> That's happening because GEP cached a connection to the local server and won't release it until the local server is stopped somehow. Once the cached connection is released the server status will reflect the right status of the remote server.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

[jira] [Resolved] (GERONIMODEVTOOLS-805) Restart bundle when Eclipse HCR fails

2013-05-24T15:52:23Z

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMODEVTOOLS-805?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Forrest Xia resolved GERONIMODEVTOOLS-805.
------------------------------------------

Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 3.0.1

> Restart bundle when Eclipse HCR fails
> -------------------------------------
>
> Key: GERONIMODEVTOOLS-805
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMODEVTOOLS-805
> Project: Geronimo-Devtools
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: eclipse-plugin
> Affects Versions: 3.0
> Reporter: Jarek Gawor
> Assignee: Jarek Gawor
> Fix For: 3.0.1
>
>
> Currently, when Eclipse hot code replace (HCR) fails at debug time the changes made to the Java class are just persisted to disk. This can be improved a bit so that the bundle is automatically restarted when HCR fails. This should allow the user to continue debugging the class without being in an inconsistent state.

[jira] [Updated] (GERONIMO-5939) Support OBR resolution during bundle install

2013-05-24T15:46:22Z

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5939?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Forrest Xia updated GERONIMO-5939:
----------------------------------

Fix Version/s: (was: 3.0.1)

> Support OBR resolution during bundle install
> --------------------------------------------
>
> Key: GERONIMO-5939
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5939
> Project: Geronimo
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Security Level: public(Regular issues)
> Components: deployment, osgi
> Affects Versions: 3.0-M1
> Reporter: Jarek Gawor
> Assignee: Rex Wang
> Attachments: GERONIMO_5939_core_modify2.patch, GERONIMO_5939_core_modify.patch, GERONIMO-5939-core.patch, GeronimoOBR_5939.patch
>
>
> When installing an individual bundle (via the admin console, command line or shell) provide an option to perform OBR resolution to install the dependent bundles.

[jira] [Updated] (GERONIMODEVTOOLS-617) Implement reordering of artifacts during deployment and run-on-server functions to adhere to specified dependencies in deployment plans and/or bundle manifests to ensure proper start order when started on the Geronimo server

2013-05-24T15:46:20Z

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMODEVTOOLS-617?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Forrest Xia updated GERONIMODEVTOOLS-617:
-----------------------------------------

Fix Version/s: (was: 3.0)

> Implement reordering of artifacts during deployment and run-on-server functions to adhere to specified dependencies in deployment plans and/or bundle manifests to ensure proper start order when started on the Geronimo server
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: GERONIMODEVTOOLS-617
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMODEVTOOLS-617
> Project: Geronimo-Devtools
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Components: eclipse-plugin
> Affects Versions: 3.0
> Reporter: Tim McConnell
> Assignee: Yi Xiao
>
> See see org.osgi.service.startlevel OSGi package

[jira] [Updated] (GERONIMODEVTOOLS-633) Implement new EJB packaging when target runtime does not have full EJB capabilities

2013-05-24T15:44:22Z

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMODEVTOOLS-633?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Forrest Xia updated GERONIMODEVTOOLS-633:
-----------------------------------------

Fix Version/s: (was: 3.0)

> Implement new EJB packaging when target runtime does not have full EJB capabilities
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: GERONIMODEVTOOLS-633
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMODEVTOOLS-633
> Project: Geronimo-Devtools
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Components: eclipse-plugin
> Affects Versions: 3.0
> Reporter: Tim McConnell
> Assignee: Yi Xiao
>
> i.e., namespace compliance and placement of EJB jar files in the WAR

[jira] [Updated] (GERONIMODEVTOOLS-632) Implement usage scenarios where target runtime is or isn't a "Web Profile" type server configuration

2013-05-24T15:44:20Z

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMODEVTOOLS-632?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Forrest Xia updated GERONIMODEVTOOLS-632:
-----------------------------------------

Fix Version/s: (was: 3.0)

> Implement usage scenarios where target runtime is or isn't a "Web Profile" type server configuration
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: GERONIMODEVTOOLS-632
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMODEVTOOLS-632
> Project: Geronimo-Devtools
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Components: eclipse-plugin
> Affects Versions: 3.0
> Reporter: Tim McConnell
> Assignee: Yi Xiao
>
> i.e., only WAR-type artifacts should be deployed on a Web Profile server

[jira] [Updated] (GERONIMODEVTOOLS-627) Implement introspection on Geronimo server to determine its capabilities

2013-05-24T15:44:20Z

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMODEVTOOLS-627?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Forrest Xia updated GERONIMODEVTOOLS-627:
-----------------------------------------

Fix Version/s: (was: 3.0)

> Implement introspection on Geronimo server to determine its capabilities
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: GERONIMODEVTOOLS-627
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMODEVTOOLS-627
> Project: Geronimo-Devtools
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Components: eclipse-plugin
> Affects Versions: 3.0
> Reporter: Tim McConnell
> Assignee: Yi Xiao
>
> May already be supported by WTP. For example:
> o Full JEE6 spec-compliant server
> o Full Web Profile spec-compliant server
> o Derivation of either

[jira] [Resolved] (GERONIMODEVTOOLS-759) Using the new APIs to manage the bundles status both in GEP and Server side

2013-05-24T15:40:20Z

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMODEVTOOLS-759?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Forrest Xia resolved GERONIMODEVTOOLS-759.
------------------------------------------

Resolution: Fixed

> Using the new APIs to manage the bundles status both in GEP and Server side
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: GERONIMODEVTOOLS-759
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMODEVTOOLS-759
> Project: Geronimo-Devtools
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: eclipse-plugin
> Affects Versions: 3.0
> Environment: WinXP sp3 32bit& Win7 64bit, Oracle JDK 1.6, Eclipse3.6SR1&SR2
> Reporter: Yi Xiao
> Assignee: Jarek Gawor
> Labels: OSGI, bundle
> Fix For: 3.0
>
> Attachments: OSGIBundleDeploy_759_noIDPersist.patch, OSGIBundleDeploy_759_persistence.patch, OSGIBundleDeploy_changeAPI2_759.patch, OSGIBundleDeploy_changeAPI.patch, OSGIBundleDeploy_changePOM_759.patch, OSGIBundleDeploy.patch
>
>
> This improvement depends on the server's modules, so, if the server side does not update timely, it may cause the GEP compile failure!

[jira] [Created] (GERONIMODEVTOOLS-811) Make GEP 3.0.1 release

2013-05-24T15:24:19Z

Forrest Xia created GERONIMODEVTOOLS-811:
--------------------------------------------

Summary: Make GEP 3.0.1 release
Key: GERONIMODEVTOOLS-811
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMODEVTOOLS-811
Project: Geronimo-Devtools
Issue Type: Task
Components: eclipse-plugin
Reporter: Forrest Xia
Assignee: Forrest Xia
Fix For: 3.0.1

Try to release gep 3.0.1 for those fixes after 3.0.0.

1. Use 3.0 branch to do the release, so need to merge changes from trunk first
2. follow this doc to do the release
https://cwiki.apache.org/GMOxPMGT/geronimo-eclipse-plugin-release-process.html

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

Re: Is there a need to release GEP 3.0.1 for Geronimo 3.0.1?

2013-05-24T11:31:41Z

I'm not entirely sure. Things just got mixed up I guess. I was
actually thinking about moving sever/3.0 branch into trunk and moving
existing server/trunk into some experimental branch.

Jarek

On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 11:48 AM, Forrest Xia <[hidden email]> wrote:

> Just curious, Is there any reason made changes to trunk, but not 3.0
> branches of GEP?
>
> I thought we should follow this convention: GEP trunk supports server trunk,
> GEP 3.0 branch supports server 3.0. branch.
>
>
> On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 11:28 PM, Jarek Gawor <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>
>> I think you used a wrong branch to compare. The latest updates went
>> into devtools/eclipse-plugin/trunk and not
>> devtools/eclipse-plugin/branches/3.0. There was a definitely lots of
>> changes since 3.0.0 so yes I would vote to release it.
>>
>> Jarek
>>
>> On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 2:01 AM, Forrest Xia <[hidden email]> wrote:
>> > Hi all,
>> >
>> > I checked GEP 3.0 branch revision history, but not found any new code
>> > fixes
>> > after its 3.0.0 release back to July of 2012, so my question is, is
>> > there a
>> > need to make a new GEP release for 3.0.1 server?
>> >
>> > I did some simple testing, the current GEP 3.0.0 release works well with
>> > 3.0.1 server.
>> >
>> > --
>> > Thanks!
>> >
>> > Regards, Forrest
>
>
>
>
> --
> Thanks!
>
> Regards, Forrest

Re: Is there a need to release GEP 3.0.1 for Geronimo 3.0.1?

2013-05-24T08:48:23Z

Just curious, Is there any reason made changes to trunk, but not 3.0 branches of GEP?

I thought we should follow this convention: GEP trunk supports server trunk, GEP 3.0 branch supports server 3.0. branch.

On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 11:28 PM, Jarek Gawor <[hidden email]> wrote:

I think you used a wrong branch to compare. The latest updates went
into devtools/eclipse-plugin/trunk and not
devtools/eclipse-plugin/branches/3.0. There was a definitely lots of
changes since 3.0.0 so yes I would vote to release it.

Jarek

On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 2:01 AM, Forrest Xia <[hidden email]> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I checked GEP 3.0 branch revision history, but not found any new code fixes
> after its 3.0.0 release back to July of 2012, so my question is, is there a
> need to make a new GEP release for 3.0.1 server?
>
> I did some simple testing, the current GEP 3.0.0 release works well with
> 3.0.1 server.
>
> --
> Thanks!
>
> Regards, Forrest

--
Thanks!

Regards, Forrest

Re: Is there a need to release GEP 3.0.1 for Geronimo 3.0.1?

2013-05-24T08:28:05Z

I think you used a wrong branch to compare. The latest updates went
into devtools/eclipse-plugin/trunk and not
devtools/eclipse-plugin/branches/3.0. There was a definitely lots of
changes since 3.0.0 so yes I would vote to release it.

Jarek

On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 2:01 AM, Forrest Xia <[hidden email]> wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> I checked GEP 3.0 branch revision history, but not found any new code fixes
> after its 3.0.0 release back to July of 2012, so my question is, is there a
> need to make a new GEP release for 3.0.1 server?
>
> I did some simple testing, the current GEP 3.0.0 release works well with
> 3.0.1 server.
>
> --
> Thanks!
>
> Regards, Forrest

Re: Is there a need to release GEP 3.0.1 for Geronimo 3.0.1?

2013-05-24T02:22:26Z

Am 24.05.2013 08:01, schrieb Forrest Xia:

> Hi all,
>
> I checked GEP 3.0 branch revision history, but not found any new code fixes after its 3.0.0 release back to July of 2012, so my question is, is there a need to make a new GEP release for 3.0.1 server?
>
> I did some simple testing, the current GEP 3.0.0 release works well with 3.0.1 server.
>
> --
> Thanks!
>
> Regards, Forrest

Dear Forrest,

it doesn't match exactly to your request, but I wanted to note that I'm using GEP 3.0.0 with Eclipse Kepler and Geronimo 2.2. I didn't have any problems with it, therefore I think there is also no need to release a special version for Ecplise Kepler.

Best regards,
Johannes

--
Johannes Weberhofer
Weberhofer GmbH, Austria, Vienna

Is there a need to release GEP 3.0.1 for Geronimo 3.0.1?

2013-05-23T23:01:28Z

Hi all,

I checked GEP 3.0 branch revision history, but not found any new code fixes after its 3.0.0 release back to July of 2012, so my question is, is there a need to make a new GEP release for 3.0.1 server?

I did some simple testing, the current GEP 3.0.0 release works well with 3.0.1 server.

--
Thanks!

Regards, Forrest

Re: [VOTE] Release Geronimo 3.0.1 - third try

2013-05-23T14:24:42Z

+1

signature/checksum, license/notice, rat, build, and simple testing all look good. Thanks Forrest!

--kevan

On May 23, 2013, at 1:26 AM, Forrest Xia <[hidden email]> wrote:

Re: [VOTE] Release Geronimo 3.0.1 - third try

2013-05-23T10:17:31Z

Le 23 mai 2013 18:45, "Mark Struberg" <[hidden email]> a écrit :

+1

LieGrue,
strub

----- Original Message -----
> From: Jarek Gawor <[hidden email]>
> To: dev <[hidden email]>
> Cc:
> Sent: Thursday, 23 May 2013, 17:23
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Geronimo 3.0.1 - third try
>
>T hings look pretty good to me +1. Thanks!
>
> Jarek
>
> On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 1:26 AM, Forrest Xia <[hidden email]> wrote:
>> This is the third time to vote for Geronimo 3.0.1 release. Thanks Jarek to
>> help on fixing Geronimo-6034.
>>
>> For Geronimo 3.0.1 release, there are these major changes:
>> 1. JSF 2.1 support
>> 2. JDBC 4 support
>> 3. Some components upgrade, including Tomcat, JPA, Yoko, Tranql, ActiveMQ
>> 4. Quite a few bugs fixes
>>
>> For details, see
>>
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/server/tags/geronimo-3.0.1/RELEASE_NOTES-3.0.1.txt
>>
>> The server code up for vote is:
>>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-034/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/3.0.1/geronimo-3.0.1-source-release.tar.gz
>>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-034/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/3.0.1/geronimo-3.0.1-source-release.zip
>>
>> The binary code up for vote is:
>> Java EE 6 Full Profile Tomcat Assemblies:
>>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-034/org/apache/geronimo/assemblies/geronimo-tomcat7-javaee6/3.0.1/geronimo-tomcat7-javaee6-3.0.1-bin.tar.gz
>>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-034/org/apache/geronimo/assemblies/geronimo-tomcat7-javaee6/3.0.1/geronimo-tomcat7-javaee6-3.0.1-bin.zip
>>
>> Java EE 6 Web Profile Tomcat Assemblies:
>>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-034/org/apache/geronimo/assemblies/geronimo-tomcat7-javaee6-web/3.0.1/geronimo-tomcat7-javaee6-web-3.0.1-bin.tar.gz
>>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-034/org/apache/geronimo/assemblies/geronimo-tomcat7-javaee6-web/3.0.1/geronimo-tomcat7-javaee6-web-3.0.1-bin.zip
>>
>> Little-G Tomcat Assemblies:
>>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-034/org/apache/geronimo/assemblies/geronimo-tomcat7-minimal/3.0.1/geronimo-tomcat7-minimal-3.0.1-bin.tar.gz
>>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-034/org/apache/geronimo/assemblies/geronimo-tomcat7-minimal/3.0.1/geronimo-tomcat7-minimal-3.0.1-bin.zip
>>
>> Staging repo is:
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-034/
>>
>> The tag has created at:
>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/server/tags/geronimo-3.0.1
>>
>> Java EE 6 TCKs all passed!
>>
>> Vote will be at least open for 72 hours.
>> [ ] +1 approve
>> [ ] +0 no opinion
>> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
>>
>> --
>> Thanks!
>>
>> Regards, Forrest
>

Re: [VOTE] Release Geronimo 3.0.1 - third try

2013-05-23T09:44:52Z

+1

LieGrue,
strub

----- Original Message -----

Re: [VOTE] Release Geronimo 3.0.1 - third try

2013-05-23T08:23:35Z

Things look pretty good to me +1. Thanks!

Jarek

On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 1:26 AM, Forrest Xia <[hidden email]> wrote:

[jira] [Resolved] (GERONIMO-6451) API jar for JSR 338 - JPA 2.1

2013-05-23T08:21:22Z

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6451?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Jarek Gawor resolved GERONIMO-6451.
-----------------------------------

Resolution: Fixed

Resolving as most of the API is defined now. Please open another bug / task for fixing any potential problems discovered by TCK testing.

> API jar for JSR 338 - JPA 2.1
> -----------------------------
>
> Key: GERONIMO-6451
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6451
> Project: Geronimo
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Security Level: public(Regular issues)
> Reporter: Kevin Sutter
> Attachments: geronimo-jpa_2.1_spec-1.0.jar, geronimo-jpa_2.1_spec-1.0.jar, geronimo-jpa_2.1_spec-1.0-src.jar, jpa2.1-src.patch.txt
>
>
> Updated JPA 2.1 jar for Java EE 7.

[jira] [Commented] (GERONIMO-6465) Make the feature of calculating artifact string from the file name better

2013-05-22T23:06:21Z

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6465?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13664909#comment-13664909 ]

xiezhi commented on GERONIMO-6465:
----------------------------------

Maven rule need to follow also.
Maven version rule:
<major>.<minor>.<revision>([ -<qualififer> ] | [ -<build> ])
major ::= number
minor ::= number
micro ::= number
qualifier ::= (alphanum)+
build :: = [1-9]?[0-9]*

> Make the feature of calculating artifact string from the file name better
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: GERONIMO-6465
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6465
> Project: Geronimo
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Security Level: public(Regular issues)
> Components: geronimo-maven-plugin, installer
> Affects Versions: 3.0-beta-1
> Reporter: xiezhi
> Priority: Minor
>
> As we know, to install a jar into geronimo repository by command tool, the file name may be a key to transfer a bundle. The geronimo will use the regex string "(.+)-([0-9].+)\\.([^0-9]+)" to extract the artiface id,version and type from the filename.
> Based on the regex string, the filename should be like "mylib-1.0.jar".
> But I think it does not accord with the OSGi rule about bundle version.
> From OSGi Core Release 5(osgi.core.5.0.0.pdf)
> A version has the following grammar:
> version ::=
> major( '.' minor ( '.' micro ( '.' qualifier )? )? )?
> major ::= number // See 1.3.2
> minor ::= number
> micro ::= number
> qualifier ::= ( alphanum | ’_’ | '-' )+
> So I think it is better to do some change.

Re: [VOTE] Release Geronimo 3.0.1 - third try

2013-05-22T22:26:51Z

+1 myself

On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 1:26 PM, Forrest Xia <[hidden email]> wrote:

This is the third time to vote for Geronimo 3.0.1 release. Thanks Jarek to help on fixing Geronimo-6034.

For Geronimo 3.0.1 release, there are these major changes:
1. JSF 2.1 support

2. JDBC 4 support
3. Some components upgrade, including Tomcat, JPA, Yoko, Tranql, ActiveMQ
4. Quite a few bugs fixes

For details, see http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/server/tags/geronimo-3.0.1/RELEASE_NOTES-3.0.1.txt

The server code up for vote is:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-034/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/3.0.1/geronimo-3.0.1-source-release.tar.gz

https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-034/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/3.0.1/geronimo-3.0.1-source-release.zip

The binary code up for vote is:
Java EE 6 Full Profile Tomcat Assemblies:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-034/org/apache/geronimo/assemblies/geronimo-tomcat7-javaee6/3.0.1/geronimo-tomcat7-javaee6-3.0.1-bin.tar.gz

https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-034/org/apache/geronimo/assemblies/geronimo-tomcat7-javaee6/3.0.1/geronimo-tomcat7-javaee6-3.0.1-bin.zip

Java EE 6 Web Profile Tomcat Assemblies:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-034/org/apache/geronimo/assemblies/geronimo-tomcat7-javaee6-web/3.0.1/geronimo-tomcat7-javaee6-web-3.0.1-bin.tar.gz

https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-034/org/apache/geronimo/assemblies/geronimo-tomcat7-javaee6-web/3.0.1/geronimo-tomcat7-javaee6-web-3.0.1-bin.zip

Little-G Tomcat Assemblies:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-034/org/apache/geronimo/assemblies/geronimo-tomcat7-minimal/3.0.1/geronimo-tomcat7-minimal-3.0.1-bin.tar.gz

https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-034/org/apache/geronimo/assemblies/geronimo-tomcat7-minimal/3.0.1/geronimo-tomcat7-minimal-3.0.1-bin.zip

Staging repo is:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-034/

The tag has created at:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/server/tags/geronimo-3.0.1

Java EE 6 TCKs all passed!

Vote will be at least open for 72 hours.
[ ] +1 approve
[ ] +0 no opinion
[ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)

--
Thanks!

Regards, Forrest

--
Thanks!

Regards, Forrest

[VOTE] Release Geronimo 3.0.1 - third try

2013-05-22T22:26:29Z

This is the third time to vote for Geronimo 3.0.1 release. Thanks Jarek to help on fixing Geronimo-6034.

For Geronimo 3.0.1 release, there are these major changes:

1. JSF 2.1 support

2. JDBC 4 support

3. Some components upgrade, including Tomcat, JPA, Yoko, Tranql, ActiveMQ

4. Quite a few bugs fixes

For details, see http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/server/tags/geronimo-3.0.1/RELEASE_NOTES-3.0.1.txt

The server code up for vote is:

https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-034/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/3.0.1/geronimo-3.0.1-source-release.tar.gz

https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-034/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/3.0.1/geronimo-3.0.1-source-release.zip

The binary code up for vote is:

Java EE 6 Full Profile Tomcat Assemblies:

https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-034/org/apache/geronimo/assemblies/geronimo-tomcat7-javaee6/3.0.1/geronimo-tomcat7-javaee6-3.0.1-bin.tar.gz

https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-034/org/apache/geronimo/assemblies/geronimo-tomcat7-javaee6/3.0.1/geronimo-tomcat7-javaee6-3.0.1-bin.zip

Java EE 6 Web Profile Tomcat Assemblies:

https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-034/org/apache/geronimo/assemblies/geronimo-tomcat7-javaee6-web/3.0.1/geronimo-tomcat7-javaee6-web-3.0.1-bin.tar.gz

https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-034/org/apache/geronimo/assemblies/geronimo-tomcat7-javaee6-web/3.0.1/geronimo-tomcat7-javaee6-web-3.0.1-bin.zip

Little-G Tomcat Assemblies:

https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-034/org/apache/geronimo/assemblies/geronimo-tomcat7-minimal/3.0.1/geronimo-tomcat7-minimal-3.0.1-bin.tar.gz

https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-034/org/apache/geronimo/assemblies/geronimo-tomcat7-minimal/3.0.1/geronimo-tomcat7-minimal-3.0.1-bin.zip

Staging repo is:

https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-034/

The tag has created at:

http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/server/tags/geronimo-3.0.1

Java EE 6 TCKs all passed!

Vote will be at least open for 72 hours.

[ ] +1 approve

[ ] +0 no opinion

[ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)

--
Thanks!

Regards, Forrest

[jira] [Resolved] (GERONIMO-6034) testSerializeSFSB(org.jboss.jsr299.tck.tests.implementation.enterprise.lifecycle.EnterpriseBeanLifecycleTest)

2013-05-22T19:00:20Z

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6034?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Forrest Xia resolved GERONIMO-6034.
-----------------------------------

Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 3.0.1
Assignee: Jarek Gawor

> testSerializeSFSB(org.jboss.jsr299.tck.tests.implementation.enterprise.lifecycle.EnterpriseBeanLifecycleTest)
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: GERONIMO-6034
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6034
> Project: Geronimo
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Security Level: public(Regular issues)
> Reporter: David Blevins
> Assignee: Jarek Gawor
> Fix For: 3.0.1
>
>

[jira] [Commented] (GERONIMO-6451) API jar for JSR 338 - JPA 2.1

2013-05-22T10:45:35Z

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6451?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13664324#comment-13664324 ]

Pinaki Poddar commented on GERONIMO-6451:
-----------------------------------------

> Committed your patch in revision 1483970.
Thanks Jarek.
> planning to validate this against TCK (signature tests)?
do not have access to TCK for JPA 2.1. Applied to jcp-open mailing list for access, but facing delay in response. Once i get the access to TCK, i will be doing some testing against these new jar/api.

[jira] [Commented] (GERONIMO-6034) testSerializeSFSB(org.jboss.jsr299.tck.tests.implementation.enterprise.lifecycle.EnterpriseBeanLifecycleTest)

2013-05-22T10:29:24Z

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6034?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13664288#comment-13664288 ]

Jarek Gawor commented on GERONIMO-6034:
---------------------------------------

Looks like the problem here is that our porting code - specifically BeansImpl.isProxy() hasn't been updated to deal with changing package names of dynamic proxies. Here are the package names I see for a few different maintenance releases of Oracle Java 6:

jdk6_43: class com.sun.proxy.$Proxy0
jdk6_39: class sun.proxy.$Proxy0
jdk6_23: class $Proxy0

Anyway, I updated the code in revision 1485297 and the tests appears to be passing now.

[jira] [Commented] (GERONIMO-6034) testSerializeSFSB(org.jboss.jsr299.tck.tests.implementation.enterprise.lifecycle.EnterpriseBeanLifecycleTest)

2013-05-22T01:49:20Z

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6034?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13663938#comment-13663938 ]

Forrest Xia commented on GERONIMO-6034:
---------------------------------------

Tried more and harder, found a clue is that, if we change openjpa version back to 2.2.1, then testSerializeSFSB pass! If no objection, I will do that change for the coming 3.0.1 release first.

However, we need a hand to look into the root cause that openjpa 2.2.2 bring in this regression.

[jira] [Commented] (GERONIMO-6034) testSerializeSFSB(org.jboss.jsr299.tck.tests.implementation.enterprise.lifecycle.EnterpriseBeanLifecycleTest)

2013-05-22T00:49:20Z

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6034?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13663903#comment-13663903 ]

Forrest Xia commented on GERONIMO-6034:
---------------------------------------

Try to look into the test code, but cannot understand why this statement "getCurrentConfiguration().getBeans().isProxy(stadtInstance)" return false now. Need expert's help on it.

Cancelled [VOTE] Release Geronimo 3.0.1 - second try

2013-05-21T21:59:19Z

On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 3:35 PM, Forrest Xia <[hidden email]> wrote:

Hi Devs,

Please vote Geronimo 3.0.1 release with these major differences from the previous release:
1. JSF 2.1 support
2. JDBC 4 support
3. Some components upgrade, including Tomcat, JPA, Yoko, Tranql, ActiveMQ
4. Quite a few bugs fixes

For details, see http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/server/tags/geronimo-3.0.1/RELEASE_NOTES-3.0.1.txt

The server code up for vote is:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-019/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/3.0.1/geronimo-3.0.1-source-release.tar.gz
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-019/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/3.0.1/geronimo-3.0.1-source-release.zip

The binary code up for vote is:
Java EE 6 Full Profile Tomcat Assemblies:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-019/org/apache/geronimo/assemblies/geronimo-tomcat7-javaee6/3.0.1/geronimo-tomcat7-javaee6-3.0.1-bin.tar.gz
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-019/org/apache/geronimo/assemblies/geronimo-tomcat7-javaee6/3.0.1/geronimo-tomcat7-javaee6-3.0.1-bin.zip

Java EE 6 Web Profile Tomcat Assemblies:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-019/org/apache/geronimo/assemblies/geronimo-tomcat7-javaee6-web/3.0.1/geronimo-tomcat7-javaee6-web-3.0.1-bin.tar.gz
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-019/org/apache/geronimo/assemblies/geronimo-tomcat7-javaee6-web/3.0.1/geronimo-tomcat7-javaee6-web-3.0.1-bin.zip

Little-G Tomcat Assemblies:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-019/org/apache/geronimo/assemblies/geronimo-tomcat7-minimal/3.0.1/geronimo-tomcat7-minimal-3.0.1-bin.tar.gz
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-019/org/apache/geronimo/assemblies/geronimo-tomcat7-minimal/3.0.1/geronimo-tomcat7-minimal-3.0.1-bin.zip

Staging repo is:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-019/

The tag has created at:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/server/tags/geronimo-3.0.1

Java EE 6 TCKs all passed!

Vote will be at least open for 72 hours.
[ ] +1 approve
[ ] +0 no opinion
[ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)

--
Thanks!

Regards, Forrest

--
Thanks!

Regards, Forrest

Re: [VOTE] Release Geronimo 3.0.1 - second try

2013-05-21T21:58:55Z

That should be easy to fix, however, I found another issue in jcdi tck run, and reopen a jira to track it https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6034, but I don't know much about jcdi tck, can anyone help on it??

On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 11:46 AM, Jarek Gawor <[hidden email]> wrote:

Sorry, I still see 3.0.1-SNAPSHOT in

./plugins/console/console-tomcat-server/pom.xml
./plugins/console/console-jetty-server/pom.xml

Jarek

On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 9:57 AM, Forrest Xia <[hidden email]> wrote:
> +1 myself
>
>
> On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 3:35 PM, Forrest Xia <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Devs,
>>
>> Please vote Geronimo 3.0.1 release with these major differences from the
>> previous release:
>> 1. JSF 2.1 support
>> 2. JDBC 4 support
>> 3. Some components upgrade, including Tomcat, JPA, Yoko, Tranql, ActiveMQ
>> 4. Quite a few bugs fixes
>>
>> For details, see
>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/server/tags/geronimo-3.0.1/RELEASE_NOTES-3.0.1.txt
>>
>> The server code up for vote is:
>>
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-019/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/3.0.1/geronimo-3.0.1-source-release.tar.gz
>>
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-019/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/3.0.1/geronimo-3.0.1-source-release.zip
>>
>> The binary code up for vote is:
>> Java EE 6 Full Profile Tomcat Assemblies:
>>
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-019/org/apache/geronimo/assemblies/geronimo-tomcat7-javaee6/3.0.1/geronimo-tomcat7-javaee6-3.0.1-bin.tar.gz
>>
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-019/org/apache/geronimo/assemblies/geronimo-tomcat7-javaee6/3.0.1/geronimo-tomcat7-javaee6-3.0.1-bin.zip
>>
>> Java EE 6 Web Profile Tomcat Assemblies:
>>
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-019/org/apache/geronimo/assemblies/geronimo-tomcat7-javaee6-web/3.0.1/geronimo-tomcat7-javaee6-web-3.0.1-bin.tar.gz
>>
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-019/org/apache/geronimo/assemblies/geronimo-tomcat7-javaee6-web/3.0.1/geronimo-tomcat7-javaee6-web-3.0.1-bin.zip
>>
>> Little-G Tomcat Assemblies:
>>
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-019/org/apache/geronimo/assemblies/geronimo-tomcat7-minimal/3.0.1/geronimo-tomcat7-minimal-3.0.1-bin.tar.gz
>>
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-019/org/apache/geronimo/assemblies/geronimo-tomcat7-minimal/3.0.1/geronimo-tomcat7-minimal-3.0.1-bin.zip
>>
>> Staging repo is:
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-019/
>>
>> The tag has created at:
>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/server/tags/geronimo-3.0.1
>>
>> Java EE 6 TCKs all passed!
>>
>> Vote will be at least open for 72 hours.
>> [ ] +1 approve
>> [ ] +0 no opinion
>> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
>>
>> --
>> Thanks!
>>
>> Regards, Forrest
>
>
>
>
> --
> Thanks!
>
> Regards, Forrest

--
Thanks!

Regards, Forrest

[jira] [Reopened] (GERONIMO-6034) testSerializeSFSB(org.jboss.jsr299.tck.tests.implementation.enterprise.lifecycle.EnterpriseBeanLifecycleTest)

2013-05-21T21:57:21Z

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6034?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Forrest Xia reopened GERONIMO-6034:
-----------------------------------

Assignee: (was: David Blevins)

This problem comes back in the latest 3.0.1 jcdi tck run.

Re: [VOTE] Release Geronimo 3.0.1 - second try

2013-05-21T20:46:21Z

Sorry, I still see 3.0.1-SNAPSHOT in

./plugins/console/console-tomcat-server/pom.xml
./plugins/console/console-jetty-server/pom.xml

Jarek

On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 9:57 AM, Forrest Xia <[hidden email]> wrote:

Re: [VOTE] Release Geronimo 3.0.1 - second try

2013-05-21T06:57:40Z

+1 myself

On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 3:35 PM, Forrest Xia <[hidden email]> wrote:

Hi Devs,

Please vote Geronimo 3.0.1 release with these major differences from the previous release:
1. JSF 2.1 support
2. JDBC 4 support
3. Some components upgrade, including Tomcat, JPA, Yoko, Tranql, ActiveMQ
4. Quite a few bugs fixes

For details, see http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/server/tags/geronimo-3.0.1/RELEASE_NOTES-3.0.1.txt

The server code up for vote is:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-019/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/3.0.1/geronimo-3.0.1-source-release.tar.gz
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-019/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/3.0.1/geronimo-3.0.1-source-release.zip

The binary code up for vote is:
Java EE 6 Full Profile Tomcat Assemblies:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-019/org/apache/geronimo/assemblies/geronimo-tomcat7-javaee6/3.0.1/geronimo-tomcat7-javaee6-3.0.1-bin.tar.gz
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-019/org/apache/geronimo/assemblies/geronimo-tomcat7-javaee6/3.0.1/geronimo-tomcat7-javaee6-3.0.1-bin.zip

Java EE 6 Web Profile Tomcat Assemblies:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-019/org/apache/geronimo/assemblies/geronimo-tomcat7-javaee6-web/3.0.1/geronimo-tomcat7-javaee6-web-3.0.1-bin.tar.gz
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-019/org/apache/geronimo/assemblies/geronimo-tomcat7-javaee6-web/3.0.1/geronimo-tomcat7-javaee6-web-3.0.1-bin.zip

Little-G Tomcat Assemblies:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-019/org/apache/geronimo/assemblies/geronimo-tomcat7-minimal/3.0.1/geronimo-tomcat7-minimal-3.0.1-bin.tar.gz
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-019/org/apache/geronimo/assemblies/geronimo-tomcat7-minimal/3.0.1/geronimo-tomcat7-minimal-3.0.1-bin.zip

Staging repo is:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-019/

The tag has created at:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/server/tags/geronimo-3.0.1

Java EE 6 TCKs all passed!

Vote will be at least open for 72 hours.
[ ] +1 approve
[ ] +0 no opinion
[ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)

--
Thanks!

Regards, Forrest

--
Thanks!

Regards, Forrest

[VOTE] Release Geronimo 3.0.1 - second try

2013-05-21T00:35:14Z

Cancelled [VOTE ] Release Geronimo 3.0.1

2013-05-20T20:09:33Z

Since some modules' versions are not updated correctly via release plugin.

On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 9:56 PM, Forrest Xia <[hidden email]> wrote:

Hi Devs,

Please vote Geronimo 3.0.1 release with these major differences from the previous release:
1. JSF 2.1 support
2. JDBC 4 support
3. Some components upgrade, including Tomcat, JPA, Yoko, Tranql, ActiveMQ
4. Quite a few bugs fixes

For details, see http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/server/tags/geronimo-3.0.1/RELEASE_NOTES-3.0.1.txt

The server code up for vote is:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-009/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/3.0.1/geronimo-3.0.1-source-release.tar.gz

https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-009/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/3.0.1/geronimo-3.0.1-source-release.zip

The binary code up for vote is:
Java EE 6 Full Profile Tomcat Assemblies:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-009/org/apache/geronimo/assemblies/geronimo-tomcat7-javaee6/3.0.1/geronimo-tomcat7-javaee6-3.0.1-bin.tar.gz

https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-009/org/apache/geronimo/assemblies/geronimo-tomcat7-javaee6/3.0.1/geronimo-tomcat7-javaee6-3.0.1-bin.zip

Java EE 6 Web Profile Tomcat Assemblies:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-009/org/apache/geronimo/assemblies/geronimo-tomcat7-javaee6-web/3.0.1/geronimo-tomcat7-javaee6-web-3.0.1-bin.tar.gz

https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-009/org/apache/geronimo/assemblies/geronimo-tomcat7-javaee6-web/3.0.1/geronimo-tomcat7-javaee6-web-3.0.1-bin.zip

Little-G Tomcat Assemblies:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-009/org/apache/geronimo/assemblies/geronimo-tomcat7-minimal/3.0.1/geronimo-tomcat7-minimal-3.0.1-bin.tar.gz

https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-009/org/apache/geronimo/assemblies/geronimo-tomcat7-minimal/3.0.1/geronimo-tomcat7-minimal-3.0.1-bin.zip

Staging repo is:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-009/

The tag has created at:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/server/tags/geronimo-3.0.1

Java EE 6 TCKs all passed!

Vote will be at least open for 72 hours.
[ ] +1 approve
[ ] +0 no opinion
[ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)

--
Thanks!

Regards, Forrest

--
Thanks!

Regards, Forrest

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Geronimo 3.0.1

2013-05-20T18:30:04Z

I will try option 2 first, if not work, will fall back to option 1. Any better idea, please speak out.

On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 11:25 PM, Jarek Gawor <[hidden email]> wrote:

Yes, that's bad. Looks like maven release plugin was executed with
-Pnoclustering option. Which means that the plugin won't process
certain modules (update the version in poms) but since the plugin
creates a tag from the branch, all source code will be included. So if
you build from tag (or source zip or tar.gz) you might end up
compiling code that was skipped by the release plugin.
So, I guess if there is something we don't want to include in a
release, we shouldn't rely on a profile option during a release but
instead either 1) svn delete the modules we don't want before the
release or 2) update poms appropriately so that modules we don't want
aren't compiled by default before the release.

Or any other better ideas?

Jarek

On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 8:25 AM, Kevan Miller <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
> I've been trying off and on to get a clean build since Friday. I'm currently failing with:
>
> [ERROR] Failed to execute goal on project geronimo-clustering-wadi: Could not resolve dependencies for project org.apache.geronimo.modules:geronimo-clustering-wadi:bundle:3.0.1-SNAPSHOT: Could not find artifact org.apache.geronimo.ext.tomcat:tribes:jar:7.0.39.1-SNAPSHOT in apache.snapshots (http://repository.apache.org/snapshots) -> [Help 1]
>
> I can try to clean out my maven repo. See if that helps. However:
>
> looks like a lot of pom.xml files have <parent>'s pointing to 3.0.1-SNAPSHOT. Try running 'grep -Rni --include=pom.xml snapshot *'
>
> --kevan
>
> On May 17, 2013, at 9:56 AM, Forrest Xia <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
>> Hi Devs,
>>
>> Please vote Geronimo 3.0.1 release with these major differences from the previous release:
>> 1. JSF 2.1 support
>> 2. JDBC 4 support
>> 3. Some components upgrade, including Tomcat, JPA, Yoko, Tranql, ActiveMQ
>> 4. Quite a few bugs fixes
>>
>> For details, see http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/server/tags/geronimo-3.0.1/RELEASE_NOTES-3.0.1.txt
>>
>> The server code up for vote is:
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-009/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/3.0.1/geronimo-3.0.1-source-release.tar.gz
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-009/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/3.0.1/geronimo-3.0.1-source-release.zip
>>
>> The binary code up for vote is:
>> Java EE 6 Full Profile Tomcat Assemblies:
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-009/org/apache/geronimo/assemblies/geronimo-tomcat7-javaee6/3.0.1/geronimo-tomcat7-javaee6-3.0.1-bin.tar.gz
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-009/org/apache/geronimo/assemblies/geronimo-tomcat7-javaee6/3.0.1/geronimo-tomcat7-javaee6-3.0.1-bin.zip
>>
>> Java EE 6 Web Profile Tomcat Assemblies:
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-009/org/apache/geronimo/assemblies/geronimo-tomcat7-javaee6-web/3.0.1/geronimo-tomcat7-javaee6-web-3.0.1-bin.tar.gz
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-009/org/apache/geronimo/assemblies/geronimo-tomcat7-javaee6-web/3.0.1/geronimo-tomcat7-javaee6-web-3.0.1-bin.zip
>>
>> Little-G Tomcat Assemblies:
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-009/org/apache/geronimo/assemblies/geronimo-tomcat7-minimal/3.0.1/geronimo-tomcat7-minimal-3.0.1-bin.tar.gz
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-009/org/apache/geronimo/assemblies/geronimo-tomcat7-minimal/3.0.1/geronimo-tomcat7-minimal-3.0.1-bin.zip
>>
>> Staging repo is:
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-009/
>>
>> The tag has created at:
>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/server/tags/geronimo-3.0.1
>>
>> Java EE 6 TCKs all passed!
>>
>> Vote will be at least open for 72 hours.
>> [ ] +1 approve
>> [ ] +0 no opinion
>> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
>>
>> --
>> Thanks!
>>
>> Regards, Forrest
>

--
Thanks!

Regards, Forrest