Mass release due to OSGi patches

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
4 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Mass release due to OSGi patches

Mark Struberg
Hi folks!

Raymond shipped a great patch to improve our OSGi handling.

https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6606

I've applied the patch, but now we should also do the releases, right?


There are quite a few specs which still use java5-flava and some others like geronimo-annotation-1.0 which are probably not used anymore at all!

How do we deal with those?

Release with Java8 and hope for bytecode compatibility?
I could also run the releases with Java6, but that's the oldest jdk I still have.

Another question: one big release with all the updates and just one single VOTE?
Or separate votes for each and every spec?

LieGrue,
strub

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Mass release due to OSGi patches

Romain Manni-Bucau
IMHO:

1. one single release
2. java 6 is ok
3. for the exclusion maybe ping aries, this is the main consumer here

Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau |  Blog | Old BlogGithub | LinkedIn | Book


Le lun. 4 juin 2018 à 11:57, Mark Struberg <[hidden email]> a écrit :
Hi folks!

Raymond shipped a great patch to improve our OSGi handling.

https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6606

I've applied the patch, but now we should also do the releases, right?


There are quite a few specs which still use java5-flava and some others like geronimo-annotation-1.0 which are probably not used anymore at all!

How do we deal with those?

Release with Java8 and hope for bytecode compatibility?
I could also run the releases with Java6, but that's the oldest jdk I still have.

Another question: one big release with all the updates and just one single VOTE?
Or separate votes for each and every spec?

LieGrue,
strub

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Mass release due to OSGi patches

Raymond Auge


On Mon, Jun 4, 2018 at 7:01 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau <[hidden email]> wrote:
IMHO:

1. one single release
2. java 6 is ok
3. for the exclusion maybe ping aries, this is the main consumer here

Knowing that I don't have a say, I would gladly through my support behind all of the above.

Sincerely,
- Ray
 

Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau |  Blog | Old BlogGithub | LinkedIn | Book


Le lun. 4 juin 2018 à 11:57, Mark Struberg <[hidden email]> a écrit :
Hi folks!

Raymond shipped a great patch to improve our OSGi handling.

https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6606

I've applied the patch, but now we should also do the releases, right?


There are quite a few specs which still use java5-flava and some others like geronimo-annotation-1.0 which are probably not used anymore at all!

How do we deal with those?

Release with Java8 and hope for bytecode compatibility?
I could also run the releases with Java6, but that's the oldest jdk I still have.

Another question: one big release with all the updates and just one single VOTE?
Or separate votes for each and every spec?

LieGrue,
strub




--
Raymond Augé (@rotty3000)
Senior Software Architect Liferay, Inc. (@Liferay)
Board Member & EEG Co-Chair, OSGi Alliance (@OSGiAlliance)
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Mass release due to OSGi patches

Mark Struberg
Everyone who does work also have a say ;)

LieGrue,
strub


> Am 04.06.2018 um 15:37 schrieb Raymond Auge <[hidden email]>:
>
>
>
> On Mon, Jun 4, 2018 at 7:01 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau <[hidden email]> wrote:
> IMHO:
>
> 1. one single release
> 2. java 6 is ok
> 3. for the exclusion maybe ping aries, this is the main consumer here
>
> Knowing that I don't have a say, I would gladly through my support behind all of the above.
>
> Sincerely,
> - Ray
>  
>
> Romain Manni-Bucau
> @rmannibucau |  Blog | Old Blog | Github | LinkedIn | Book
>
>
> Le lun. 4 juin 2018 à 11:57, Mark Struberg <[hidden email]> a écrit :
> Hi folks!
>
> Raymond shipped a great patch to improve our OSGi handling.
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6606
>
> I've applied the patch, but now we should also do the releases, right?
>
>
> There are quite a few specs which still use java5-flava and some others like geronimo-annotation-1.0 which are probably not used anymore at all!
>
> How do we deal with those?
>
> Release with Java8 and hope for bytecode compatibility?
> I could also run the releases with Java6, but that's the oldest jdk I still have.
>
> Another question: one big release with all the updates and just one single VOTE?
> Or separate votes for each and every spec?
>
> LieGrue,
> strub
>
>
>
>
> --
> Raymond Augé (@rotty3000)
> Senior Software Architect Liferay, Inc. (@Liferay)
> Board Member & EEG Co-Chair, OSGi Alliance (@OSGiAlliance)