Mirroring Geronimo Config on Github?

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
8 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|  
Report Content as Inappropriate

Mirroring Geronimo Config on Github?

John D. Ament
All,

Would anyone be against mirroring the Geronimo Config module on github?  I think it would be a good thing to get more people aware of the feature.

Second, who can I talk to get access to edit http://geronimo.apache.org/ ?  I think it would be good to start adding docs on how to use Config.

John
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|  
Report Content as Inappropriate

Re: Mirroring Geronimo Config on Github?

Romain Manni-Bucau


Le 17 juil. 2017 04:13, "John D. Ament" <[hidden email]> a écrit :
All,

Would anyone be against mirroring the Geronimo Config module on github?  I think it would be a good thing to get more people aware of the feature.

+1


Second, who can I talk to get access to edit http://geronimo.apache.org/ ?  I think it would be good to start adding docs on how to use Config.

Do we want to use confluence or use a static generated site? (Based on jbake?)

This option makes it easier to contribute IMO and to maintain.


John

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|  
Report Content as Inappropriate

Re: Mirroring Geronimo Config on Github?

John D. Ament


On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 1:02 AM Romain Manni-Bucau <[hidden email]> wrote:


Le 17 juil. 2017 04:13, "John D. Ament" <[hidden email]> a écrit :
All,

Would anyone be against mirroring the Geronimo Config module on github?  I think it would be a good thing to get more people aware of the feature.

+1


Ok, I've requested it https://issues.apache.org/jira/servicedesk/customer/portal/1/INFRA-14619 though at some point we may want to consider git repos (which are now fully self serve).
 

Second, who can I talk to get access to edit http://geronimo.apache.org/ ?  I think it would be good to start adding docs on how to use Config.

Do we want to use confluence or use a static generated site? (Based on jbake?)

This option makes it easier to contribute IMO and to maintain.

I agree, the usage of confluence for a website feels weird.  I wouldn't mind spending time working on a new website for Geronimo.  I've been able to get jbake working obviously for other sites.  
 


John

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|  
Report Content as Inappropriate

Re: Mirroring Geronimo Config on Github?

Mark Struberg
Great, txs a bunch!

LieGrue,
strub


> Am 18.07.2017 um 00:10 schrieb John D. Ament <[hidden email]>:
>
>
>
> On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 1:02 AM Romain Manni-Bucau <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
>
> Le 17 juil. 2017 04:13, "John D. Ament" <[hidden email]> a écrit :
> All,
>
> Would anyone be against mirroring the Geronimo Config module on github?  I think it would be a good thing to get more people aware of the feature.
>
> +1
>
>
> Ok, I've requested it https://issues.apache.org/jira/servicedesk/customer/portal/1/INFRA-14619 though at some point we may want to consider git repos (which are now fully self serve).
>  
>
> Second, who can I talk to get access to edit http://geronimo.apache.org/ ?  I think it would be good to start adding docs on how to use Config.
>
> Do we want to use confluence or use a static generated site? (Based on jbake?)
>
> This option makes it easier to contribute IMO and to maintain.
>
> I agree, the usage of confluence for a website feels weird.  I wouldn't mind spending time working on a new website for Geronimo.  I've been able to get jbake working obviously for other sites.  
>  
>
>
> John
>

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|  
Report Content as Inappropriate

Re: Mirroring Geronimo Config on Github?

Romain Manni-Bucau
Hmm, maybe we should move to git before they do the proxy. Any blocker?

Want to give a try for jbake? TomEE and Meecrowave have pdf support for pages which can be something we want to import (nice for offline reading) but can be done after. Anyway, big +1 for it.

Le 18 juil. 2017 06:38, "Mark Struberg" <[hidden email]> a écrit :
Great, txs a bunch!

LieGrue,
strub


> Am 18.07.2017 um 00:10 schrieb John D. Ament <[hidden email]>:
>
>
>
> On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 1:02 AM Romain Manni-Bucau <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
>
> Le 17 juil. 2017 04:13, "John D. Ament" <[hidden email]> a écrit :
> All,
>
> Would anyone be against mirroring the Geronimo Config module on github?  I think it would be a good thing to get more people aware of the feature.
>
> +1
>
>
> Ok, I've requested it https://issues.apache.org/jira/servicedesk/customer/portal/1/INFRA-14619 though at some point we may want to consider git repos (which are now fully self serve).
>
>
> Second, who can I talk to get access to edit http://geronimo.apache.org/ ?  I think it would be good to start adding docs on how to use Config.
>
> Do we want to use confluence or use a static generated site? (Based on jbake?)
>
> This option makes it easier to contribute IMO and to maintain.
>
> I agree, the usage of confluence for a website feels weird.  I wouldn't mind spending time working on a new website for Geronimo.  I've been able to get jbake working obviously for other sites.
>
>
>
> John
>

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|  
Report Content as Inappropriate

Re: Mirroring Geronimo Config on Github?

Mark Struberg
I'm actually quite happy with SVN for Geronimo.
In SVN you can easily move things around. In GIT you have to create a separate repo for each module.
That might become a bit much
So for now SVN works fine for me. No strong feelings though.

LieGrue,
strub


> Am 18.07.2017 um 07:28 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau <[hidden email]>:
>
> Hmm, maybe we should move to git before they do the proxy. Any blocker?
>
> Want to give a try for jbake? TomEE and Meecrowave have pdf support for pages which can be something we want to import (nice for offline reading) but can be done after. Anyway, big +1 for it.
>
> Le 18 juil. 2017 06:38, "Mark Struberg" <[hidden email]> a écrit :
> Great, txs a bunch!
>
> LieGrue,
> strub
>
>
> > Am 18.07.2017 um 00:10 schrieb John D. Ament <[hidden email]>:
> >
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 1:02 AM Romain Manni-Bucau <[hidden email]> wrote:
> >
> >
> > Le 17 juil. 2017 04:13, "John D. Ament" <[hidden email]> a écrit :
> > All,
> >
> > Would anyone be against mirroring the Geronimo Config module on github?  I think it would be a good thing to get more people aware of the feature.
> >
> > +1
> >
> >
> > Ok, I've requested it https://issues.apache.org/jira/servicedesk/customer/portal/1/INFRA-14619 though at some point we may want to consider git repos (which are now fully self serve).
> >
> >
> > Second, who can I talk to get access to edit http://geronimo.apache.org/ ?  I think it would be good to start adding docs on how to use Config.
> >
> > Do we want to use confluence or use a static generated site? (Based on jbake?)
> >
> > This option makes it easier to contribute IMO and to maintain.
> >
> > I agree, the usage of confluence for a website feels weird.  I wouldn't mind spending time working on a new website for Geronimo.  I've been able to get jbake working obviously for other sites.
> >
> >
> >
> > John
> >
>

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|  
Report Content as Inappropriate

Re: Mirroring Geronimo Config on Github?

Romain Manni-Bucau
+0 as well, proposed it cause we got an unknown issue at tomee preventing the proxying with a sub svn tree. Super fine to move lazily if we hit a blocker only.

Le 18 juil. 2017 07:36, "Mark Struberg" <[hidden email]> a écrit :
I'm actually quite happy with SVN for Geronimo.
In SVN you can easily move things around. In GIT you have to create a separate repo for each module.
That might become a bit much
So for now SVN works fine for me. No strong feelings though.

LieGrue,
strub


> Am 18.07.2017 um 07:28 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau <[hidden email]>:
>
> Hmm, maybe we should move to git before they do the proxy. Any blocker?
>
> Want to give a try for jbake? TomEE and Meecrowave have pdf support for pages which can be something we want to import (nice for offline reading) but can be done after. Anyway, big +1 for it.
>
> Le 18 juil. 2017 06:38, "Mark Struberg" <[hidden email]> a écrit :
> Great, txs a bunch!
>
> LieGrue,
> strub
>
>
> > Am 18.07.2017 um 00:10 schrieb John D. Ament <[hidden email]>:
> >
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 1:02 AM Romain Manni-Bucau <[hidden email]> wrote:
> >
> >
> > Le 17 juil. 2017 04:13, "John D. Ament" <[hidden email]> a écrit :
> > All,
> >
> > Would anyone be against mirroring the Geronimo Config module on github?  I think it would be a good thing to get more people aware of the feature.
> >
> > +1
> >
> >
> > Ok, I've requested it https://issues.apache.org/jira/servicedesk/customer/portal/1/INFRA-14619 though at some point we may want to consider git repos (which are now fully self serve).
> >
> >
> > Second, who can I talk to get access to edit http://geronimo.apache.org/ ?  I think it would be good to start adding docs on how to use Config.
> >
> > Do we want to use confluence or use a static generated site? (Based on jbake?)
> >
> > This option makes it easier to contribute IMO and to maintain.
> >
> > I agree, the usage of confluence for a website feels weird.  I wouldn't mind spending time working on a new website for Geronimo.  I've been able to get jbake working obviously for other sites.
> >
> >
> >
> > John
> >
>

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|  
Report Content as Inappropriate

Re: Mirroring Geronimo Config on Github?

John D. Ament
Personally, using github + git makes it easier to track where contributions are coming from, otherwise you need to mention in commit message or back in an issue about who created the patch.  Right now, SVN works well enough, but we'll see if it hinders contributions.

Here's the repo on github - https://github.com/apache/geronimo-config

John

On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 2:19 AM Romain Manni-Bucau <[hidden email]> wrote:
+0 as well, proposed it cause we got an unknown issue at tomee preventing the proxying with a sub svn tree. Super fine to move lazily if we hit a blocker only.

Le 18 juil. 2017 07:36, "Mark Struberg" <[hidden email]> a écrit :
I'm actually quite happy with SVN for Geronimo.
In SVN you can easily move things around. In GIT you have to create a separate repo for each module.
That might become a bit much
So for now SVN works fine for me. No strong feelings though.

LieGrue,
strub


> Am 18.07.2017 um 07:28 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau <[hidden email]>:
>
> Hmm, maybe we should move to git before they do the proxy. Any blocker?
>
> Want to give a try for jbake? TomEE and Meecrowave have pdf support for pages which can be something we want to import (nice for offline reading) but can be done after. Anyway, big +1 for it.
>
> Le 18 juil. 2017 06:38, "Mark Struberg" <[hidden email]> a écrit :
> Great, txs a bunch!
>
> LieGrue,
> strub
>
>
> > Am 18.07.2017 um 00:10 schrieb John D. Ament <[hidden email]>:
> >
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 1:02 AM Romain Manni-Bucau <[hidden email]> wrote:
> >
> >
> > Le 17 juil. 2017 04:13, "John D. Ament" <[hidden email]> a écrit :
> > All,
> >
> > Would anyone be against mirroring the Geronimo Config module on github?  I think it would be a good thing to get more people aware of the feature.
> >
> > +1
> >
> >
> > Ok, I've requested it https://issues.apache.org/jira/servicedesk/customer/portal/1/INFRA-14619 though at some point we may want to consider git repos (which are now fully self serve).
> >
> >
> > Second, who can I talk to get access to edit http://geronimo.apache.org/ ?  I think it would be good to start adding docs on how to use Config.
> >
> > Do we want to use confluence or use a static generated site? (Based on jbake?)
> >
> > This option makes it easier to contribute IMO and to maintain.
> >
> > I agree, the usage of confluence for a website feels weird.  I wouldn't mind spending time working on a new website for Geronimo.  I've been able to get jbake working obviously for other sites.
> >
> >
> >
> > John
> >
>

Loading...