OSGi-fy microprofile impls

[Raymond Auge]

Will there be objections if I OSGi-fy the MP impls? Mostly this will consist of metadata.

Other dependencies to build a bootstrap MP runtime based on OSGi using the latest methods are almost ready.

- Ray

PS: I still plan to do a big spec release soon after I return from vacation. I've already tested the changes to replace the legacy Geronimo loader with Service Loader Mediator in the most important specs and it's a beautiful thing.

[Romain Manni-Bucau]

Hi Raymond,

If it doesn't add any dependency (other than provided) a big +1 from me.

Le mar. 24 juil. 2018 à 15:00, Raymond Auge <[hidden email]> a écrit :

Will there be objections if I OSGi-fy the MP impls? Mostly this will consist of metadata.

Other dependencies to build a bootstrap MP runtime based on OSGi using the latest methods are almost ready.

- Ray

PS: I still plan to do a big spec release soon after I return from vacation. I've already tested the changes to replace the legacy Geronimo loader with Service Loader Mediator in the most important specs and it's a beautiful thing.

[Mark Struberg]

yup same. +1

LieGrue,
strub

> Am 24.07.2018 um 15:11 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau <[hidden email]>:
>
> Hi Raymond,
>
> If it doesn't add any dependency (other than provided) a big +1 from me.
>
> Romain Manni-Bucau
> @rmannibucau |  Blog | Old Blog | Github | LinkedIn | Book
>
>
> Le mar. 24 juil. 2018 à 15:00, Raymond Auge <[hidden email]> a écrit :
> Will there be objections if I OSGi-fy the MP impls? Mostly this will consist of metadata.
>
> Other dependencies to build a bootstrap MP runtime based on OSGi using the latest methods are almost ready.
>
> - Ray
>
> PS: I still plan to do a big spec release soon after I return from vacation. I've already tested the changes to replace the legacy Geronimo loader with Service Loader Mediator in the most important specs and it's a beautiful thing.