OSGi review of the geronimo-validation_2.0_spec api

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
4 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

OSGi review of the geronimo-validation_2.0_spec api

Mark Struberg
hi folks (especially Raymond and Romain)
Could you please check if the OSGi bits in the validation-2.0 spec module are proper?


Would love to release it as we need it for the upcoming Apache BVal-2.0 release.


txs and LieGrue,
strub

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: OSGi review of the geronimo-validation_2.0_spec api

Raymond Auge
Hey Mark,

Everything looks good for me.

Sincerely,
- Ray

On Fri, Sep 21, 2018 at 8:44 AM Mark Struberg <[hidden email]> wrote:
hi folks (especially Raymond and Romain)
Could you please check if the OSGi bits in the validation-2.0 spec module are proper?


Would love to release it as we need it for the upcoming Apache BVal-2.0 release.


txs and LieGrue,
strub



--
Raymond Augé (@rotty3000)
Senior Software Architect Liferay, Inc. (@Liferay)
Board Member & EEG Co-Chair, OSGi Alliance (@OSGiAlliance)
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: OSGi review of the geronimo-validation_2.0_spec api

Romain Manni-Bucau
Looks good to me too but only did simple tests

Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau |  Blog | Old BlogGithub | LinkedIn | Book


Le ven. 21 sept. 2018 à 16:39, Raymond Auge <[hidden email]> a écrit :
Hey Mark,

Everything looks good for me.

Sincerely,
- Ray

On Fri, Sep 21, 2018 at 8:44 AM Mark Struberg <[hidden email]> wrote:
hi folks (especially Raymond and Romain)
Could you please check if the OSGi bits in the validation-2.0 spec module are proper?


Would love to release it as we need it for the upcoming Apache BVal-2.0 release.


txs and LieGrue,
strub



--
Raymond Augé (@rotty3000)
Senior Software Architect Liferay, Inc. (@Liferay)
Board Member & EEG Co-Chair, OSGi Alliance (@OSGiAlliance)
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: OSGi review of the geronimo-validation_2.0_spec api

Jean-Baptiste Onofré
Same, I took a quick look and it looks good.

Regards
JB

On 21/09/2018 16:57, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:

> Looks good to me too but only did simple tests
>
> Romain Manni-Bucau
> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> |  Blog
> <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github
> <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | LinkedIn
> <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book
> <https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance>
>
>
> Le ven. 21 sept. 2018 à 16:39, Raymond Auge <[hidden email]
> <mailto:[hidden email]>> a écrit :
>
>     Hey Mark,
>
>     Everything looks good for me.
>
>     Sincerely,
>     - Ray
>
>     On Fri, Sep 21, 2018 at 8:44 AM Mark Struberg <[hidden email]
>     <mailto:[hidden email]>> wrote:
>
>         hi folks (especially Raymond and Romain)
>         Could you please check if the OSGi bits in the validation-2.0
>         spec module are proper?
>
>         https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/trunk/geronimo-validation_2.0_spec/
>
>         Would love to release it as we need it for the upcoming Apache
>         BVal-2.0 release.
>
>
>         txs and LieGrue,
>         strub
>
>
>
>     --
>     *Raymond Augé*
>     <http://www.liferay.com/web/raymond.auge/profile> (@rotty3000)
>     Senior Software Architect *Liferay, Inc.*
>     <http://www.liferay.com> (@Liferay)
>     Board Member & EEG Co-Chair, OSGi Alliance <http://osgi.org>
>     (@OSGiAlliance)
>

--
Jean-Baptiste Onofré
[hidden email]
http://blog.nanthrax.net
Talend - http://www.talend.com