[VOTE] Release Geronimo Spec JCDI 2.0 v1.0.1

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
9 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

[VOTE] Release Geronimo Spec JCDI 2.0 v1.0.1

John D. Ament
Hi All

I was running the steps needed to release JCDI 2.0 Spec v1.0.1.  There's only a couple small changes in this release:

- Handle CDIProvider per the spec (cache the provider, lazily call the impl)
- Added a @since 2.0 on setObserverMethod

(sha1, asc, md5 are next to this file)

I'll leave this vote open at least 72 hours, hopefully get 3 binding +1's by then.

Here's my own +1 to release

[ ] +1 ship it
[ ] +/- 0 don't care
[ ] -1 don't ship because...
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [VOTE] Release Geronimo Spec JCDI 2.0 v1.0.1

Alan Cabrera-2
John, is your key in https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/KEYS?


Regards,
Alan

On Aug 30, 2017, at 5:10 PM, John D. Ament <[hidden email]> wrote:

Hi All

I was running the steps needed to release JCDI 2.0 Spec v1.0.1.  There's only a couple small changes in this release:

- Handle CDIProvider per the spec (cache the provider, lazily call the impl)
- Added a @since 2.0 on setObserverMethod

(sha1, asc, md5 are next to this file)

I'll leave this vote open at least 72 hours, hopefully get 3 binding +1's by then.

Here's my own +1 to release

[ ] +1 ship it
[ ] +/- 0 don't care
[ ] -1 don't ship because...

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [VOTE] Release Geronimo Spec JCDI 2.0 v1.0.1

John D. Ament
Thanks for the reminder Alan.  Fixed, key is present now.

John

On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 2:26 AM Alan Cabrera <[hidden email]> wrote:
John, is your key in https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/KEYS?


Regards,
Alan

On Aug 30, 2017, at 5:10 PM, John D. Ament <[hidden email]> wrote:

Hi All

I was running the steps needed to release JCDI 2.0 Spec v1.0.1.  There's only a couple small changes in this release:

- Handle CDIProvider per the spec (cache the provider, lazily call the impl)
- Added a @since 2.0 on setObserverMethod

(sha1, asc, md5 are next to this file)

I'll leave this vote open at least 72 hours, hopefully get 3 binding +1's by then.

Here's my own +1 to release

[ ] +1 ship it
[ ] +/- 0 don't care
[ ] -1 don't ship because...

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [VOTE] Release Geronimo Spec JCDI 2.0 v1.0.1

Alan Cabrera-2
Thanks.  A few questions:
  • What is the tag for this release?
  • Do we want to include run_sigtest.sh and not the requisite test jars?
  • If the answer is yes, should we include a README that explains how to get the test jars?
  • Should the NOTICE file have 2017 instead of 2015?

Regards,
Alan

On Aug 31, 2017, at 3:19 AM, John D. Ament <[hidden email]> wrote:

Thanks for the reminder Alan.  Fixed, key is present now.

John

On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 2:26 AM Alan Cabrera <[hidden email]> wrote:
John, is your key in https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/KEYS?


Regards,
Alan

On Aug 30, 2017, at 5:10 PM, John D. Ament <[hidden email]> wrote:

Hi All

I was running the steps needed to release JCDI 2.0 Spec v1.0.1.  There's only a couple small changes in this release:

- Handle CDIProvider per the spec (cache the provider, lazily call the impl)
- Added a @since 2.0 on setObserverMethod

(sha1, asc, md5 are next to this file)

I'll leave this vote open at least 72 hours, hopefully get 3 binding +1's by then.

Here's my own +1 to release

[ ] +1 ship it
[ ] +/- 0 don't care
[ ] -1 don't ship because...


Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [VOTE] Release Geronimo Spec JCDI 2.0 v1.0.1

John D. Ament
It looks like there's a few other errors in the NOTICE file.  If you want I can re-roll with the fixes.

Sigtests were run as a part of https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6553 there were no sig changes in this release.  I'm actually not set up to run sigtests (and not sure its relevance to this release).


John

On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 9:50 AM Alan Cabrera <[hidden email]> wrote:
Thanks.  A few questions:
  • What is the tag for this release?
  • Do we want to include run_sigtest.sh and not the requisite test jars?
  • If the answer is yes, should we include a README that explains how to get the test jars?
  • Should the NOTICE file have 2017 instead of 2015?

Regards,
Alan

On Aug 31, 2017, at 3:19 AM, John D. Ament <[hidden email]> wrote:

Thanks for the reminder Alan.  Fixed, key is present now.

John

On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 2:26 AM Alan Cabrera <[hidden email]> wrote:
John, is your key in https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/KEYS?


Regards,
Alan

On Aug 30, 2017, at 5:10 PM, John D. Ament <[hidden email]> wrote:

Hi All

I was running the steps needed to release JCDI 2.0 Spec v1.0.1.  There's only a couple small changes in this release:

- Handle CDIProvider per the spec (cache the provider, lazily call the impl)
- Added a @since 2.0 on setObserverMethod

(sha1, asc, md5 are next to this file)

I'll leave this vote open at least 72 hours, hopefully get 3 binding +1's by then.

Here's my own +1 to release

[ ] +1 ship it
[ ] +/- 0 don't care
[ ] -1 don't ship because...


Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [VOTE] Release Geronimo Spec JCDI 2.0 v1.0.1

Romain Manni-Bucau
+1 (we can fix the notice for next one)


Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau |  Blog | Old BlogGithub | LinkedIn | JavaEE Factory

2017-08-31 16:04 GMT+02:00 John D. Ament <[hidden email]>:
It looks like there's a few other errors in the NOTICE file.  If you want I can re-roll with the fixes.

Sigtests were run as a part of https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6553 there were no sig changes in this release.  I'm actually not set up to run sigtests (and not sure its relevance to this release).


John

On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 9:50 AM Alan Cabrera <[hidden email]> wrote:
Thanks.  A few questions:
  • What is the tag for this release?
  • Do we want to include run_sigtest.sh and not the requisite test jars?
  • If the answer is yes, should we include a README that explains how to get the test jars?
  • Should the NOTICE file have 2017 instead of 2015?

Regards,
Alan

On Aug 31, 2017, at 3:19 AM, John D. Ament <[hidden email]> wrote:

Thanks for the reminder Alan.  Fixed, key is present now.

John

On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 2:26 AM Alan Cabrera <[hidden email]> wrote:
John, is your key in https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/KEYS?


Regards,
Alan

On Aug 30, 2017, at 5:10 PM, John D. Ament <[hidden email]> wrote:

Hi All

I was running the steps needed to release JCDI 2.0 Spec v1.0.1.  There's only a couple small changes in this release:

- Handle CDIProvider per the spec (cache the provider, lazily call the impl)
- Added a @since 2.0 on setObserverMethod

(sha1, asc, md5 are next to this file)

I'll leave this vote open at least 72 hours, hopefully get 3 binding +1's by then.

Here's my own +1 to release

[ ] +1 ship it
[ ] +/- 0 don't care
[ ] -1 don't ship because...



Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [VOTE] Release Geronimo Spec JCDI 2.0 v1.0.1

Alan Cabrera-2
In reply to this post by John D. Ament
+1 on releasing as is

The notice and removal of the run_sigtest.sh file can happen later, if you wish.


Regards,
Alan

On Aug 31, 2017, at 7:04 AM, John D. Ament <[hidden email]> wrote:

It looks like there's a few other errors in the NOTICE file.  If you want I can re-roll with the fixes.

Sigtests were run as a part of https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6553 there were no sig changes in this release.  I'm actually not set up to run sigtests (and not sure its relevance to this release).


John

On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 9:50 AM Alan Cabrera <[hidden email]> wrote:
Thanks.  A few questions:
  • What is the tag for this release?
  • Do we want to include run_sigtest.sh and not the requisite test jars?
  • If the answer is yes, should we include a README that explains how to get the test jars?
  • Should the NOTICE file have 2017 instead of 2015?

Regards,
Alan

On Aug 31, 2017, at 3:19 AM, John D. Ament <[hidden email]> wrote:

Thanks for the reminder Alan.  Fixed, key is present now.

John

On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 2:26 AM Alan Cabrera <[hidden email]> wrote:
John, is your key in https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/KEYS?


Regards,
Alan

On Aug 30, 2017, at 5:10 PM, John D. Ament <[hidden email]> wrote:

Hi All

I was running the steps needed to release JCDI 2.0 Spec v1.0.1.  There's only a couple small changes in this release:

- Handle CDIProvider per the spec (cache the provider, lazily call the impl)
- Added a @since 2.0 on setObserverMethod

(sha1, asc, md5 are next to this file)

I'll leave this vote open at least 72 hours, hopefully get 3 binding +1's by then.

Here's my own +1 to release

[ ] +1 ship it
[ ] +/- 0 don't care
[ ] -1 don't ship because...



Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [VOTE] Release Geronimo Spec JCDI 2.0 v1.0.1

Mark Struberg
+1 for releasing it.

And please do NOT remove the run_sigtest.sh script!

Most people will not need it, but it is a precious script for people who want to verify/make sure that our version of the spec does really fit the official specs! And those people will also know where to get the official artifact from.

LieGrue,
strub


> Am 31.08.2017 um 16:50 schrieb Alan Cabrera <[hidden email]>:
>
> +1 on releasing as is
>
> The notice and removal of the run_sigtest.sh file can happen later, if you wish.
>
>
> Regards,
> Alan
>
>> On Aug 31, 2017, at 7:04 AM, John D. Ament <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>
>> It looks like there's a few other errors in the NOTICE file.  If you want I can re-roll with the fixes.
>>
>> Sigtests were run as a part of https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6553 there were no sig changes in this release.  I'm actually not set up to run sigtests (and not sure its relevance to this release).
>>
>> The tag can be found at http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-jcdi_2.0_spec-1.0.1/
>>
>> John
>>
>> On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 9:50 AM Alan Cabrera <[hidden email]> wrote:
>> Thanks.  A few questions:
>> • What is the tag for this release?
>> • Do we want to include run_sigtest.sh and not the requisite test jars?
>> • If the answer is yes, should we include a README that explains how to get the test jars?
>> • Should the NOTICE file have 2017 instead of 2015?
>>
>> Regards,
>> Alan
>>
>>> On Aug 31, 2017, at 3:19 AM, John D. Ament <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>>
>>> Thanks for the reminder Alan.  Fixed, key is present now.
>>>
>>> John
>>>
>>> On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 2:26 AM Alan Cabrera <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>> John, is your key in https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/KEYS?
>>>
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Alan
>>>
>>>> On Aug 30, 2017, at 5:10 PM, John D. Ament <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi All
>>>>
>>>> I was running the steps needed to release JCDI 2.0 Spec v1.0.1.  There's only a couple small changes in this release:
>>>>
>>>> - Handle CDIProvider per the spec (cache the provider, lazily call the impl)
>>>> - Added a @since 2.0 on setObserverMethod
>>>>
>>>> Staging Repo: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-1036/
>>>> Source release: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-1036/org/apache/geronimo/specs/geronimo-jcdi_2.0_spec/1.0.1/geronimo-jcdi_2.0_spec-1.0.1-source-release.zip 
>>>> (sha1, asc, md5 are next to this file)
>>>>
>>>> I'll leave this vote open at least 72 hours, hopefully get 3 binding +1's by then.
>>>>
>>>> Here's my own +1 to release
>>>>
>>>> [ ] +1 ship it
>>>> [ ] +/- 0 don't care
>>>> [ ] -1 don't ship because...
>>>
>>
>

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

RESULTS (was Re: [VOTE] Release Geronimo Spec JCDI 2.0 v1.0.1)

John D. Ament
All,

Vote passes with 4 binding +1's from Mark, Alan, Romain and myself.

I'll wrap up the release process shortly.

John

On Sat, Sep 2, 2017 at 1:03 PM Mark Struberg <[hidden email]> wrote:
+1 for releasing it.

And please do NOT remove the run_sigtest.sh script!

Most people will not need it, but it is a precious script for people who want to verify/make sure that our version of the spec does really fit the official specs! And those people will also know where to get the official artifact from.

LieGrue,
strub


> Am 31.08.2017 um 16:50 schrieb Alan Cabrera <[hidden email]>:
>
> +1 on releasing as is
>
> The notice and removal of the run_sigtest.sh file can happen later, if you wish.
>
>
> Regards,
> Alan
>
>> On Aug 31, 2017, at 7:04 AM, John D. Ament <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>
>> It looks like there's a few other errors in the NOTICE file.  If you want I can re-roll with the fixes.
>>
>> Sigtests were run as a part of https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6553 there were no sig changes in this release.  I'm actually not set up to run sigtests (and not sure its relevance to this release).
>>
>> The tag can be found at http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-jcdi_2.0_spec-1.0.1/
>>
>> John
>>
>> On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 9:50 AM Alan Cabrera <[hidden email]> wrote:
>> Thanks.  A few questions:
>>      • What is the tag for this release?
>>      • Do we want to include run_sigtest.sh and not the requisite test jars?
>>      • If the answer is yes, should we include a README that explains how to get the test jars?
>>      • Should the NOTICE file have 2017 instead of 2015?
>>
>> Regards,
>> Alan
>>
>>> On Aug 31, 2017, at 3:19 AM, John D. Ament <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>>
>>> Thanks for the reminder Alan.  Fixed, key is present now.
>>>
>>> John
>>>
>>> On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 2:26 AM Alan Cabrera <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>> John, is your key in https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/KEYS?
>>>
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Alan
>>>
>>>> On Aug 30, 2017, at 5:10 PM, John D. Ament <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi All
>>>>
>>>> I was running the steps needed to release JCDI 2.0 Spec v1.0.1.  There's only a couple small changes in this release:
>>>>
>>>> - Handle CDIProvider per the spec (cache the provider, lazily call the impl)
>>>> - Added a @since 2.0 on setObserverMethod
>>>>
>>>> Staging Repo: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-1036/
>>>> Source release: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-1036/org/apache/geronimo/specs/geronimo-jcdi_2.0_spec/1.0.1/geronimo-jcdi_2.0_spec-1.0.1-source-release.zip
>>>> (sha1, asc, md5 are next to this file)
>>>>
>>>> I'll leave this vote open at least 72 hours, hopefully get 3 binding +1's by then.
>>>>
>>>> Here's my own +1 to release
>>>>
>>>> [ ] +1 ship it
>>>> [ ] +/- 0 don't care
>>>> [ ] -1 don't ship because...
>>>
>>
>